I would have to say C, <span>The French converted many Native Americans to Catholicism but allowed the Native Americans to maintain their culture
</span>
Answer:
D) Their behaviors are the result of the interaction of nature and nurture.
Explanation:
The "nature versus nurture" debate is a centuries-old debate about what determines human behavior. This debate becomes more heated when discussing the actions of certain individuals that have been universally reviled, like dictator Adolf Hitler, serial killer Ted Bundy, and Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. Were they born "evil", or did they become "evil". According to researcher Matt Riley, on his <em>Nature via Nurture</em> book, the relation between nature and nurture isn't one dominating over the other, or a simple causal relationship of one creating the other. Rather, there exists a dialectical relationship between both. In other words, the <u>behaviors of the men listed above are the result of the interaction of nature and nurture</u>, where each one of these can't explain their actions alone and by itself. Rather, it is the interaction between their genetic makeup and their particular life experiences that created their personalities.
I think it does because 2016 was a really good year
They needed to
Farm there food and wanted their food to be close to their homes
Answer:
b. informed consent
Explanation:
Informed consent refers to participants agreeing to their role in an experiment only after they have been adequately informed of all the risks and benefits that this activity involves. In order to avoid ethical problems, participants should only participate once they possess this information. Moreover, depending on the nature of the experiment, participants might have to go through a debriefing process afterwards to ensure that they were not damaged in any way by their participation.
