Answer:
$71,000
Explanation:
The computation of operating income is shown below:-
Total costs if company bought = Cost of production × Outside supplier per unit) + (Fixed cost × Remaining percentage)
= (43,000 × $3.80) + ($68,000 × (100% - 30%))
= (43,000 × $3.80) + ($68,000 × 70%)
= $163,400 + $47,600
= $211,000
Loss in Income if part is bought = Total costs if company bought - Total costs originally
= $211,000 - $140,000
= $71,000
Therefore, Making profit will be more by $71,000 and for computing the Loss in Income if part is bought we simply applied the above formula.
Actual budget performance report compares actual performance and budgeted performance based on actual activity level.
<h3>What is a budget?</h3>
A budget serves as a term that describes how to place our needs on our income, it is a way to balance our expenses and income.
Actual budget performance report gives room to
compares actual performance and budgeted performance based on actual activity level.
Learn more about budget at:
brainly.com/question/6663636
Answer: A. equal to marginal cost where it intersects the demand curve
Explanation:
In a pure competition, the market is efficient because it balances demand and supply and gives an equilibrium price that takes both of them into account.
In this market, the price is equal to the marginal revenue of a firm and the profit maximizing level of production is where the marginal revenue intersects the marginal cost.
The efficient level is therefore where price equals marginal cost. The same goes for a natural monopoly. If economic efficiency is to be achieved, the natural monopoly's price must equal the marginal cost at the equilibrium price.
Jill will not win because this is an illusory promise without consideration.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Even if Jill sues his boss Constance for not giving him the bonus that she had promised to give if her employee, Jill works with great focus and dedication, he will probably not win the case.
The reason for this is that it was just a promise and not a contract signed between that employer and that employee. It was just an illusory promise which is not enough to sue the person or the employer. So there was no benefit of doing it.
