The two z's in buzzer form a consonant sound blend in the word.
Answer:
Temporal Transitions are used to show the frequency, duration, specific time, or beginning or end of something. They bring your reader through the story from beginning to end.
Relationship: With regards to, Coupled with, in the same way
Sequence/Shift in time or setting: First, Earlier, meanwhile
Suspense Building: Suddenly, Little by little, out of the blue
Answer:
vfjfjvkhhgkgibsgdkdbcmdbdmfbdkdbdnckfbkd
Answer:
An arpeggio is:
B. playing a series of chords in a particular order
Explanation:
All right here we go. This is a very difficult question because is not very clear. However, we need to remember what an arpeggio is. An arpeggio is a small scale of different notes arranged in a degrading or increasing pattern of order. So, the answer that guards more similarity with the concept is: b) because c and d say it is discontinuous, which is not the nature of the arpeggio. So we have only a and b. But a is not the case because it says simultaneously. When arpeggio has order.
He wanted to convey that indifference is worse than hate or anger. One could be angry at injustice or hate evil, violent acts Indifference is the absence of compassion and implies something worse than outright hate; indifference implies a lack of acknowledgment. Being indifferent to another's suffering is like saying, 'you're suffering is not even worth my consideration.' Wiesel speaks from his experience of the Holocaust, but this could be applied to any situation in history in which the world was indifferent; in which the world willfully refused to acknowledge suffering of others for any number of unjustifiable reasons: 1) out of sight, out of mind, 2) passivity, laziness, 3) an untried feeling of hopelessness ('what could i possibly do?'), 4) selfishness. When Wiesel speaks of indifference he also means ignorance in 3 senses: 1) ignorant as in lacking sensitivity, 2) lacking knowledge and 3) ignoring. The 'perils of indifference' could be described as the 'the terrible outcomes of ignoring atrocities. Apply this to anything today, where suffering is ignored by indifferent people and governments. (i.e., Darfur, Haiti). The peril of indifference would be to allow (allow by ignoring = indifference) an atrocity like the Holocaust to occur again.
