Can U guys answer these 3 questions for me

Select all the ratios that are equivalent to the ratio 12:3. explain how you know( show multiplication or division)

grigory [225]

Answer:

C 4:1

D 24:6

F 1200:300

Step-by-step explanation:

The given ratio is $\frac{12}{3}$

Simplify

Divide by 3 both numerator and denominator

$\frac{4}{1}$

Verify each case

case A) we have

$\frac{6}{1}$

Compare with the given ratio

$\frac{6}{1} \neq \frac{4}{1}$

therefore

The ratio is not equivalent

case B) we have

$\frac{1}{4}$

Compare with the given ratio

$\frac{1}{4} \neq \frac{4}{1}$

therefore

The ratio is not equivalent

case C) we have

$\frac{4}{1}$

Compare with the given ratio

$\frac{4}{1}=\frac{4}{1}$

therefore

The ratio is equivalent

case D) we have

$\frac{24}{6}$

Simplify

Divide by 6 both numerator and denominator

$\frac{4}{1}$

Compare with the given ratio

$\frac{4}{1}=\frac{4}{1}$

therefore

The ratio is equivalent

case E) we have

$\frac{15}{6}$

Simplify

Divide by 3 both numerator and denominator

$\frac{5}{2}$

Compare with the given ratio

$\frac{5}{2} \neq \frac{4}{1}$

therefore

The ratio is not equivalent

case F) we have

$\frac{1,200}{300}$

Simplify

Divide by 300 both numerator and denominator

$\frac{4}{1}$

Compare with the given ratio

$\frac{4}{1}=\frac{4}{1}$

therefore

The ratio is equivalent

case G) we have

$\frac{112}{13}$ ----> irreducible

Compare with the given ratio

$\frac{112}{13} \neq \frac{4}{1}$

therefore

The ratio is not equivalent

3 0

3 years ago

Work out the inverse function y=x-2

AURORKA [14]

Answer:

x + 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Replace the x with y.

Making is x = y -2

Solve for x=y-2

and you get x+2

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What property is (3×4) 5 =(5×4) 3

ozzi

Associative property

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Numbers 11-14 pls I’m having a lot of trouble

Ksivusya [100]

The term "closed" in math means that if you take two items from a set, do some operation, then you'll always get another value in the same set (sometimes you may get the same value as used before). For example, adding two whole numbers leads to another whole number. We therefore say "the set of whole numbers is closed under addition". This applies to integers as well because integers are positive and negative whole numbers. So we can say that integers are closed under addition.

Integers are not closed under division. Take two integers like 2 an 5 and divide: 2/5 = 0.4 which is not an integer. Integers don't have decimal parts.

The set of whole numbers is {0,1,2,3,...} and we can subtract the two values 1 and 2 to get 1-2 = -1. The order matters here. Subtracting a larger value from a smaller leads to a negative. The value -1 is not in the set of whole numbers. So we can say that whole numbers is not closed under subtraction

Finally, the set of irrational numbers is closed under addition. Adding any two irrational numbers leads to another irrational number. For instance, pi+sqrt(2) = 3.142 + 1.414 = 4.556; I'm using rounded decimals as approximate values. An irrational number is one where we cannot write it as a fraction of integers. Contrast that with a rational number in which we can write it as a fraction of integers. Example: 10 = 10/1 is a rational number.

6 0

4 years ago

Help quick. Need fast. Thx

topjm [15]

A. first one is your answer.

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers