Answer:
C) II and III
- Act as a dealer
- Charge a mark-up or a mark-down
Explanation:
Dealers can purchase and sell securities on their own accounts, this is called position trading. When they carry on this type of transactions, they charge markups instead of commissions.
Brokers act like agents, and they can only arrange a transaction between clients and they charge a commission for their work.
Answer:
$2.70 mixing; $4.40 sampling
Explanation:
Activity based costing is a process by which the various activities in a production process are identified and cost allocated to each one. Each of these actity costs are added as product cost. It involves assigning indirect cost to direct cost.
For mixing department the cost rate is $0.9 per hour for 3 machine hours. So cost is (0.9* 3)= $2.7
For sampling the rate is $2.20 for 2 tests. So cost is (2.20* 2)= $4.4
Answer:
The correct answer is the option: True.
Explanation:
First of all, the<em> Australian Prudential Regulation Authority</em> or APRA is the name given to an independent statutory authority whose main purpose is to regulate and supervise institutions across banking, insurance and superannuation and promotes financial system stability in Australia.
Secondly, <em>authorized deposit-taking institutions</em> are those financial institutions that are permitted to accept deposits from the public in Australia and <u>all financial intermediaries that are registered are authorized to carry out financial intermediation</u>.
The best ground on which the defendant ( Company S ) can dismiss the suit filed by the plaintiff (Company T) is the standing to sue.
<h3>What is standing to sue?</h3>
Standing to sue refers to a situation where the plaintiff who has filed the case must prove with appropriate proof of having damages or injuries in respect of the conduct of the defendant.
In the provided case, Company T has to prove that the products of Company S are actually defective through appropriate evidence. If Company T can't able to prove their alleged claim before the court, then the case is decided in the favor of the defendant party, that is, Company S.
Therefore, the standing to sue can be used as a ground by Company S for dismissing the claim of Company T.
Learn more about the standing to sue in the related link:
brainly.com/question/14820416
#SPJ4
