The event caused Ivan to be less terrible for a short period of time was his mother's death.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
Ivan IV Vasilyevich was a Moscow prince, and in 1547, he became the earliest Russian tsar. He was an dictatorial ruler and during his reign the people suffered greatly because he was responsible for the massacre in Novgorod.
He killed both his elder son and unborn grandson, which led to political instability in the empire. Ivan's childhood was full of struggles when his mother died at the age of eight and spent his childhood as a peasant, fighting between rival aristocrats.
Answer:
Enslaved people make use of various means to cope with the repression and degradation of life on the plantation, through the following means amongst others:
1. Religion
2. Keeping relationships of family and friends
3. Passing on of family and cultural stories and traditions
4. Planning larger scale revolts
Explanation:
During 19th century, a lot of enslaved men and women worked in various capacities,such as working on a large agricultural plantations, house servants or field hands. In this period, the treatment of enslaved men and women was characterized by by its brutality, as they were subjected to repression, harsh punishments, and strict racial policing.
However, in order to cope with this repression and degradation of life on the plantation, enslaved people made use of various means amongst others, which are:
1. Religion
2. Keeping relationships of family and friends
3. Passing on of family and cultural stories and traditions
4. Planning larger scale revolts
It should be noted that the ability to actively perceive the distance from themselves to objects in the environment is depth perception.
<h3>What is depth perception?</h3>
The depth perception is the ones eyes' ability to judge the distance between two objects.
This is when both of your eyes perceive the same object slightly differently and merge it into one 3-D image.
Learn more depth perception at;
brainly.com/question/9042666
Answer:
The use of the term "ethical" sometimes is a bit too lax when applied to evaluate situations. However, sometimes, it can also be too harsh. In response to your two questions, these would be the answers:
1. The ethical question here would be whether Greedy was right in overusing a benefit that the charitable organization had with the First California Bank. As President of the organization, it is in the hands of Greedy to ensure not just development, but also sustainable development of the organization. However, in the course of his attempts to improve the growth and efficacy of Send Me Money, he abused the benefit of the overdraft, and not to just any extent, but to the negative balance of 10.000 dollars. Although his intentions were in favor of the organization, and he used the money wisely, there still lies the question of if he could not have accomplished just as much, without abusing a benefit that could very well mean the end of the organization. So the ethical issue is that although the intention of Greedy was in the benefit of the organization, he did not take the best interest of it into account, because if he had, he would have tried to accomplish his goals without bringing the debt so high.
2. I disapprove of the way that Bill Greedy acted because he could have accomplished much more realistic goals and not placed the organization at risk by raising the debt to a bank to such high levels. Even if he increased fundraising efforts, it is evident that these were not successful, as the debt is so high.
Answer: Aptitude
Explanation:
Aptitude test is a test to determine an individual's propensity to succeed in a given activity. Aptitude tests assume that individuals have inherent strengths and weaknesses, and have a natural inclination toward success or failure in specific areas based on their innate characteristics. Aptitude test tests the individual's speed, accuracy, and how smart they can be on task when in tight corners or challenges
