Answer:
I hope it helps u.
Explanation:
Arms races have generated a great deal of interest for a variety of reasons. They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security, but agreement stops there. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations. The opposing view holds that engaging in an arms race is often a state's best option for avoiding war when faced with an aggressive adversary. Debate over the causes of arms races is just as divided. One school believes that arms races are primarily rational responses to external threats and opportunities, whereas arms race skeptics believe that arms buildups are usually the product of a mixture of internal, domestic interests, including those of the scientists involved in research and development (R&D), the major producers of weapons systems, and the military services that will operate them. The policy implications of these contending views are equally contradictory; critics see arms control as a way to reduce the probability of war and rein in domestic interests that are distorting the state's security policy, and proponents argue that military competition is most likely to protect the state's international interests and preserve peace.
Arms buildups and arms races also play a prominent role in international relations (IR) theory. Building up arms is one of a state's three basic options for acquiring the military capabilities it requires to achieve its international goals; the other two are gaining allies and cooperating with its adversary to reduce threats. In broad terms, choosing between more competitive and more cooperative combinations of these options is among the most basic decisions a state must make, and it is often the most important.
Mark me as brainlist answer,
Have a nice day,
Thank you ☺
During the french revolution in 1789, they came up with new policies and concepts of human rights and universal civilisation, policies in the favor of the french citizens and other such other changes took place.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Haitian revolution in 1791 was influenced by the French Revolution and it was led by the slaves who fought for their rights and freedom and ending the system of white slave owners and they were succeeded not just to end the slavery but to gain control over the French colony.
The Haitian Slave resistance had a worldwide effect that came to past the island. A portion of these impacts included loss of land and assets for the frontier French realm, expanded worry of future slave uprisings in the United States.
Answer:
C. They wanted a more severe punishment for the south.
Explanation:
Radical Republicans during those times would be hard hitting to the south.
Unity. Clay hoped that the federal government would create a market-driven economy that would help unify the nation's various regions. For example, stimulating the nation's infant industries would, in turn, create more demand for the West's raw materials.
Answer:
Renaissance. Renaissance. It demonstrated the integrity and importance of the person. This campaign came about from the study of classical culture and of a community of topics identified as the "humanitarian studies."
Explanation:
