Answer:
all these are included in the gross income
Explanation:
given data
damages = $36,250
emotional distress = $10,100
punitive damages = $58,200
to find out
What amount must Paul include in his gross income
solution
we know according to the tax laws that specify only payment on account of (1) physical injury and (2) physical sickness is non taxable
so here taxpayers receive
they are not associate with the physical injury so all these mentioned are not covered in physical damages
so we can say that all these are included in the gross income
Answer:
At the markets eqilibirium , the quantity demand and the quantity supplied will be equal.If there is a shortage, the quantity demand will be larger than the quantity supplied. If there is a surplus , the quantity demand will be smaller than the quantity supplied.
Explanation:
Answer:
$89,900
Explanation:
The computation of the product cost is shown below:
= Manufacturing Equipment Depreciation + Indirect Materials Used + Indirect Labor + Factory Repair and Maintenance + Direct Materials Used + Direct Labor
= $1,800 + $8,800 + $15,000 + $800 + $27,500 + $36,000
= $89,900
It is a mix of direct labor cost, direct material cost and the manufacturing overhead cost
Answer:
Eddith Carolina could accept to take on the new cosmetic line, while Michael Sanders may reject same.
Explanation:
Eddith Carolina, been the president of the company, has shown that he's a risk taker. The idea behind this is that he is open to new opportunities that could otherwise improve his holdings and networth. The decision to take on a new cosmetic line is therefore in line with the policy of the President of the company. The implication is that Eddith Carolina is tilted to accepting the proposal.
Michael Sanders, on the other hand, is an ordinary employee. Even though he is the manager of the division, he bears no risk of ownership. And in an event of liquidation or solvency, he simply has no big collateral to part with, unlike the Eddith Carolinas. What individual like Michael Sanders are interested in is the protection of their job and income. Knowing the nature of an employee as conservative and risk averse and the fear of not loosing their paid job, it is therefore not surprising that Michael Sanders could reject the new cosmetic line bid.