Two Roman Historians and There Difference:
<span>·
</span>Titus Livy – The Roman Historian who is
responsible for writing or making use of legends. He was able to write the
monumental history of the Rome and even its people.
<span>·
</span>Aeneas Tacticus – The Roman Historian
responsible for writing history that is factional. He is considered to be one
of the earliest Greek Writers.
Answer:
I would assume that it is C. Africa
Explanation:
This is because, if you look at the map, a large portion of Africa is deemed as an area with economic water scarcity. The other regions of Africa is listed as not estimated and approaching water scarcity.
Fairly primitive compared to what he and the others had brought as they had brought guns and the Taínos brought clubs and bows and arrows
The Crusades were called because of religious devotion but the call was answered because to the desire for political and economic gain.
A call went out for soldiers to take Jerusalem from the Seljuk Turks.
Many second and third sons answered the call. In the Holy Land they could carve out principalities and become Lords. In Western Europe the land was all taken. The call was answer by most Crusaders for dreams of political and economic gain.
The Eastern Roman Empire had appealed for help became of the amount of land and control that they had lost to the Seljuk Turks.
The agreement with the Pope was that the Crusaders would liberate not only Jerusalem but the lands lost to the control of the Turks.
When the Crusaders liberated the land they kept the land for themselves. This showed that the reasons that the Crusaders answered the call was not religious devotion but economic greed.
Haha, hope this helps. <3 !
