All of them are correct except for Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe is a country hat relies upon agricultural profit. they export tobacco, cotton, and sugar. without them you probably wouldn't have sugar cookies
Here are some of the choices I gathered:
A) There was no data, observations, or theories to support Lemaitre's idea.
B) The accepted view was that the Universe was infinite and eternal.
C) Lemaitre was a Catholic Priest and his views weren't taken seriously.
The ANSWER is A. There was no data, observations, or theories to support Lemaitre's idea.
TRUE
Hallucinogens are drugs that cause hallucinations this is a profound distortion in a person's perceptions of reality, which include delusions and false notions. In this state, people see images, hear sounds, and feel sensations that seem real but do not exist. Some people experience flashbacks after use of this drugs. The flashbacks typically happens in days or weeks following ingestion of the hallucinogen drug.
Answer: Have you tried Google? :)
Explanation:
liberalism
[ˈlib(ə)rəˌlizəm]
NOUN
willingness to respect or accept behaviour or opinions different from one's own; openness to new ideas.
"one of the basic tenets of liberalism is tolerance"
the holding of political views that are socially progressive and promote social welfare.
"Brooklyn prides itself on being a great bastion of liberalism and diversity"
theology
the belief that many traditional beliefs are dispensable, invalidated by modern thought, or liable to change.
a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise.
"representative democracy operates under the principles of classical liberalism"
the doctrine of a Liberal Party or (in the UK) the Liberal Democrats.
Answer:
- Sophie will lose because she does not have a medical license.
Explanation:
As per the given details, the result of the given proceeding is most likely to go against Sophie and consequently, 'she will lose it because she does not have a medical license.' Due to lack of a medical license as a consequence of her past involvement in addiction to illegal drugs, <u>she would not be able to validate her claim legally</u> that 'she injected a filler into Vanessa and her ten friends' despite being an experienced and accomplished surgeon due to lack of legal permission and authority. Thus, <u>her claim gets overruled and legally unjustifiable</u>. As a result, she would lose the case against Vanessa to demand to pay for the treatment she had made to her and her friends.