<u>Answer:</u>
Libertarianism and utilitarianism are in opposition to one another. In utilitarianism, individuals accept that an activity that produces satisfaction is the thing that one ought to go. Utilitarians could not care less whether what they are doing occupies someone else's privileges. While, in libertarianism, an individual's activity for bliss ought not to disregard someone else's rights. Libertarians’ esteem activities that advance reasonableness and equity in the general public dissimilar to the practical actions that now and again damages decency and fairness.
False the answer is false thanks<span />
The life of an average Egyptian in the ancient times was difficult. Most of them have devoted themselves to working in the agricultural realm <span>in which the work of plowing, planting and harvesting were still defined to be very difficult. They often work hard to exchange their crops to meat. Answer is No.</span>
Answer: C.) British officers were often forced to serve in subordinate roles to their colonial counterparts.
For the most part, this was the opposite. The frustration was on the part of the colonial forces as they were often forced to serve in subordinate roles.
The clash of command was a serious problem for the militias. British officers generally regarded themselves as higher than colonial ones, which colonial officers considered an offence. The solution was to divide each militia unit into smalled commands, and to recommisision militia officers with a rank of captain and above with a rank of captain. This demoted all the high-ranking colonial officers and placed them as subordinate to British captains. The new system was extremely unpopular with colonials and caused many of them to resign from the military.
