Answer: how peer pressure to conform would influence the judgment and individuality of a test subject.
Explanation:
When a class is through using a culture, it should be deposited on the cleanup cart rather than being poured down the sink drain because doing so runs the danger of contaminating and blocking the sink and necessitating proper disposal of the contamination, which could contaminate the water supply.
<h3>Which of the following actions is necessary if a microbial culture is spilled?</h3>
After telling the instructor that you spilled or dropped a culture, you should wipe the area down with a paper towel and use disinfectant. Clean up the mess with new paper towels after waiting fifteen minutes. After using the restroom, don't forget to wash your hands completely and dispose of the paper towels. Take the proper steps to dispose of any shattered glass.
<h3>Why did you need to use ethanol to clean the work area?</h3>
To maintain an aseptic/sterile environment, 70% ethanol is frequently used to clean surfaces that have been contaminated with microorganisms. Because 70% ethanol will negatively impact bacteria's cell walls and their ability to grow and multiply. Osmotic pressure will be produced when ethanol and water are combined, which is another factor.
Learn more about Osmotic pressure: brainly.com/question/15501096
#SPJ4
Answer:
They moved because they had more saftey there. All the women ruled this area. They ruled it very farily and gave equal rights to everyone.
It was when Creon announces what the oracle has told him.
Oedipus, the lord of Thebes, has sent Creon who is his brother in law, to the Apollo to request that the oracle on advice on how end the plague. Creon returns, bearing news: once the one who murdered the past ruler, Laius, is discovered, Thebes will be restored of the torment and the events after that begin.
The inciting incident is a scene, plot point or occasion that guides the audience into the story. This specific minute is the point at which an occasion pushes the hero into the principle activity of the story.
<span>In January 1830, in a dramatic encounter on the floor of the United States Senate, the debate over the nature of the Union took an alarming turn. The debate moved beyond the exchange of alternative views on how to administer the federal government to accusations and recriminations about the destruction of the federal government and the Union. States’ rights and nationalist positions, which previously were adopted without regard to a consistent pattern of sectional identification or alignment, were defined in a way that portended political violence between irreconcilably opposed sections. The event that presented this portent of sectional discord was the debate over the nature of the Union between Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina.</span>
