Answer:
They believed that if the federal government had control of the army and the militia it would be very dangerous, because the government would have a strong centralization of power.
Explanation:
For anti-federalists, allowing the government to have centralized control of the militia would give a lot of power to the head of federal control, that is, it would give a lot of power to the president. This could promote a strong abuse of power, as the country's armed forces would be controlled by a single person, who would be too powerful to be prevented from acting as he wished.
Answer:
The answer is Political rights
Explanation:
right to change their government with out violence, and citizens exercised this right in practice through cyclical, free, and fair elections.
The correct statement is that Sarah and Angelina Grimké sacrificed their ties to their former community for the sake of reform. So, the correct option is A.
Sarah and Angelina were reform activists being put under forced situation to cut their ties with their former community as they wanted to bring about a reform to the slavery system.
<h3>Reform Activists</h3>
- Sarah and Angelina were determined to end the slavery system that had existed in their region for a prolonged period of time. They had led to activism for ending women slavery.
- However, they belonged to a community which was primarily engaged in enslaving people, especially women. So, they were under a forced requirement to cut the ties with their community.
Hence, the correct option is A that Sarah and Angelina had to cut and sacrifice their ties to their former community in order to reform the activism of woman slavery.
Learn more about reform activists here:
brainly.com/question/9984406
Pluralism. An open, participatory style of government in which many different interests are represented.
Recognition by components (RBC) and feature integration theory (FIT) do a good job of explaining how perception works but fail in one important area. accounting for knowledge and experience. Option A
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
Recognition by components (RBC)?</h3>
Generally, Irving Biederman first suggested the recognition-by-components hypothesis, sometimes known as the RBC theory, in 1987 in an effort to provide an explanation for object recognition.
In conclusion, Both the recognition by components theory (RBC) and the feature integration theory (FIT) do a decent job of describing how perception works, but both of them fall short in one crucial area. taking into consideration one's acquired skills and experience Alternative A
Read more about Recognition by components (RBC)
brainly.com/question/5439846
#SPJ1
complete question
Recognition by components (RBC) and feature integration theory (FIT) do a good job of explaining how perception works, but fail in one important area. What is that area?
A. accounting for knowledge and experience
B. how specific features are used to combine into the objects that we perceive
C. the neurological pathway from the eye to the visual cortex
D. the neurology behind the dorsal and ventral streams