Yes should the philosophy of determinism be blindly accepted than in fact predicting the future should be possible. however you would literally need to know every single variable ever so practically impossible. therefore the lack of a future predicting machine does not in fact disprove or weaken the arguement of determinism.
The best technique for obtaining information regarding student entry skills and readiness levels to be successful for a planned activity is <u>Formative Assessment.</u>
<u></u>
Formative Assessment refers to those assessments which provide information to students and teachers about the different ways in which one can create engaging lesson plan, and thus come up with improved teaching and learning methods.
These methods are usually informal in nature and the data can help the teachers understand the different skills of the students and figure out how ready can they for any activity.
In fact, data from summative assessment can be used for formative experiments.
To learn more about formative assessment, click
brainly.com/question/20733548
#SPJ4
Answer: Glass ceiling
Explanation: It is, in fact, a barrier to personal advancement that is not publicly acknowledged to exist but unofficially exists. It is called a glass barrier or ceiling because it is officially invisible (glass), does not exist, but in practice it does. The ceiling in the coin hints at the height of the barrier that this barrier sets, in other words it would be a career ceiling because it cannot be advanced beyond it. This type of barrier often affects women as well as minorities. As in the case of Maria, no matter how good one is at work, because of gender or minority, one cannot cross this glass ceiling, because it is simply an invisible barrier for the aforementioned minority members and women.
Answer:
I would say highways but i'm not entirely sure
Explanation:
Answer: the correct anwer is A. A suit seeking to assert the interest of state citizens in retaining diplomatic relations with a foreign nation.
Explanation:
Under the Article III, section 2, the United States Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and in which the state is a party. In option A, the state is trying to act in parents patriae which is to act as representative of its citizens thereby asserting their interests that is to say that the state is not a party in the case. In all other case the state is a party and has incumbency in the matter.
