Answer: (B) Retrospective voting
Explanation:
The retrospecting voting is one of the type of voting that can be made by taking all the political party and the administration performance factors into the considerations.
It is one of the important mechanisms for representing the democracy as well as its policy performance and in this form of voting the voters are firstly judge the power and then performance of the political party.
According to the given scenario, on the election day he is engaging with the retrospective voting for the presidential candidate.
Therefore, Option (B) is correct.
I don’t understand spanish, sorry
That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
Answer:
Pennsylvania is the answer
Answer:
A person from Germany is from a low-context culture.
Explanation:
A low-context culture communicates information in a very explicit and direct way. As the example states, meanings are derived from written and spoken words, being very clear.
This is in contrast to high-context cultures in which ways are more implicit and subtle.
Germans are known for being very direct and tend to speak in a very explicit way.
