<em>thanks</em><em> for</em><em> your</em><em> </em><em>question</em><em> </em><em>and </em><em>please</em><em> correct</em><em> me</em><em> if</em><em> I'm</em><em> </em><em>wrong.</em>
<em>please </em><em>press </em><em>the </em><em>heart </em><em>and </em><em>brainli</em><em>e</em><em>sts </em><em>answer</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>and </em><em>5</em><em>s</em><em>t</em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>rating</em>
Answer:
either B or C.. but I'm really strong on B sorry if im wrong this is just my opinion
Explanation:
I think the answer would be B because if you co-sign and that person don't pay their part.. it falls on you because toy are the second party and the co-signer
but I also think it would be C a little too because if that person not paying they part it could put a dent in yours credit score because y'all co-signed together
Interesting
the question please?
Given that a directional hypothesis is a prediction made by a researcher regarding a positive or negative change, relationship, or difference between two variables of a population, a two-tailed test is the perfect tool to validate it because a two-tailed test is designed to examine both sides of a specified data range.
So the final answer to this question is:
True.
