Answer:
Sarah's dad asks her this question because he is a werewolf. The text states, "The thing was wearing a torn-up pair of red pants. "Just like my dad's," she thought as she drifted off."
Here’s a few examples of Warfare Developments from WW2 and shortly after WW2:
(Specific developments are <em>Bolded and Italicized</em>)
Jet Aircraft, Ballistic Missiles, Atomic Weapons, a primary troop landing craft called <em>The Higgins Boat</em>, a six-wheel-drive amphibious truck called <em>The DUKW</em>, <em>the</em> <em>Drop Tank</em>, a bomber used by the British called <em>Bristol Blenheim</em>, an operational jet fighter that was used by the Germans and brought in late in the war called the <em>Messerschmitt Me 262</em>, and <em>Tetra Ethyl Lead</em> added by the USA to fuel Allied Airplanes, giving them more speed, higher compression ratios, higher efficiency, more range, and reducing the cooling load.
No, I didn’t copy and paste this like the rest of the lazy people on here, I wrote it by hand, so you’re welcome.
Answer:
The basic cosmological argument merely establishes that a First Cause exists, not that it has the attributes of a theistic god, such as omniscience, omnipotence, and omnibenevolence.[23] This is why the argument is often expanded to show that at least some of these attributes are necessarily true, for instance in the modern Kalam argument given above.[1]
Explanation:
Secondly, it is argued that the premise of causality has been arrived at via a posteriori (inductive) reasoning, which is dependent on experience. David Hume highlighted this problem of induction and argued that causal relations were not true a priori. However, as to whether inductive or deductive reasoning is more valuable still remains a matter of debate, with the general conclusion being that neither is prominent.[22] Opponents of the argument tend to argue that it is unwise to draw conclusions from an extrapolation of causality beyond experience.[1]One objection to the argument is that it leaves open the question of why the First Cause is unique in that it does not require any causes. Proponents argue that the First Cause is exempt from having a cause, while opponents argue that this is special pleading or otherwise untrue.[1] Critics often press that arguing for the First Cause’s exemption raises the question of why the First Cause is indeed exempt,[20] whereas defenders maintain that this question has been answered by the various arguments, emphasizing that none of its major forms rests on the premise that everything has a cause.[21]
The curtains rattle ghostlily along is an example of Personification. Thus, option A is correct.
<h3>What is figurative language? </h3>
Figurative language means that the written stanza is depicted in a way that is not real but is written to give an idea about how in reality it is. It is also written to make the stanza look creative and twisty also it creates interest in the people.
In this sentence, the way the curtains are moving is depicted by the use of Personification. In personification, the word is given a quality that it appears or looks like. the curtain's movement or shadow looks like a ghost or behaves like one. Therefore, option A is the correct option.
Learn more about figurative language, here:
brainly.com/question/9879484
#SPJ1
I’m pretty sure it’s the first one