Question

imagine some arguments that start from faulty assumptions such as if pigs could fly or if money grew on trees. what would be some of the logical consequences?

Answer 1

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Some of the logical consequences when an individual uses faulty assumptions such as "if pigs could fly" or "if money grew on trees" to wage arguments, is that those assumptions are not base on reality and are kind of metaphors or language figures to state a point in the conversation.

So, the discussion could derive in something that is not productive for the parts involved and a real solution could be delayed. Instead, using facts, data, and logical reasons can greatly improve any dialogue an invites the parts to reach a conclusion or agreement that satisfies both parts.

Answer 2

For the "pigs could fly," there is no logical consequence. For the "If money grew on trees," well technically it really does because the paper used to make money is from trees. Thank you for posting your question. I hope that this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.