Answer:
Explanation:
The Texas economy did not truly feel the effects of the oil boom until 1942, when global war caused a new demand for oil.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
These were the advantages and disadvantages of joining the Inca empire.
Disadvantages.
You lost just rights as a member of your tribe and surrender yourself to the will of the Inca Emperor.
You had to pay tribute to the Incas.
You depended on the political and economic decisions of the Incas.
Advantages.
You received protection from the common enemies.
You could visit parts of the empire, including Machu Picchu, and benefited from the services of the city.
As part of the powerful Inca Empire, you receive an education.
The Inca had a public education system under the oversight of a government authority.
For the Inca people, education was a priority. And the Inca emperor ordered to have a good education system in the empire. Although in the empire there were social classes, education was for all divided into two: the education designed for the upper classes and the education designed for the Inca people in general.
They dealt with plagues and the ground was hard to till
Answer:
They were dependent on slavery and cash crops.
Explanation:
The industrial revolution started in the northern states way before it make its way to the southern states.
On the years leading up to the civil war, the northern states already used technology as a backbone for their productions while the southern states still relied on slave labors to increase the production in their plantation.
This contributed to the difference on how they view slavery and eventually led to their clash during the United States civil war.
Answer:
In any regard, supporters of <em>laissez-faire </em>governmental policies were often advocates for the "free market". They would suggest that federal or state involvement in business would stagnate and decelerate the growth of the economy. The "invisible hand" of the market does not actually exist, but this argument would be made in order to support the assertion that government involvement was not required. In reality, significant economic downfalls of the past could have been avoided, had the governments of "unregulated business" nations played a more active role. Claims such as these were made for the purpose of promoting a self-sustaining economy, even when such a thing cannot coexist with financial disparity.
I hope this helped you understand the motives behind <em>laissez-faire </em> business and government policies. Blessings to you.
