Answer: $726,957.60
Explanation:
The debit to Lease Receivable is the present value of the payments to be made by B Corp. for the 8 years.
Payments are made twice a year so period is 16 periods.
Rate = 8% /2
= 4%
Present value = Payments * Present value of an annuity due factor, 16 periods, 4%
= 59,980 * 12.12
= $726,957.60
Answer:
The solution shows that a rate of return of 10% which provides an annuity factor of 4.868 generates an NPV which is equal to zero. Thus, our IRR or internal rate of return is 10%.
Explanation:
The IRR or internal rate of return is the rate at which NPV or Net Present Value of the investment becomes zero. We are provided with the initial outlay for the project and the annual cash inflows along with time period. Using the annuity factors given below, we need to find out the factor which makes the NPV zero. The NPV is calculated as follows,
NPV = Present Value of Cash Inflows - Initial Outlay
We can try out each annuity factor and see what NPV is generates.
1. 6% rate (Annuity factor = 5.582)
NPV = (30000 * 5.582) - 146040
NPV = $21420
2. 8% rate (Annuity factor = 5.206)
NPV = (30000 * 5.206) - 146040
NPV = $10140
3. 10% rate (Annuity factor = 4.868)
NPV = (30000 * 4.868) - 146040
NPV = $0
So, from the above solution we can see that a rate of return of 10% which provides an annuity factor of 4.868 generates an NPV which is equal to zero. Thus, our IRR or internal rate of return is 10%
Answer:
Department M
Manufacturing overhead rate = $600,000/200,000 hrs = $3/hr
Department A
Manufacturing overhead rate = $400,000/800,000 hrs = $0.5/hr
Manufacturing overhead cost allocated:
Department M = $3 x 8,000 = $24,000
Department A = $0.5 x 12,000 = $6,000
Total manufacturing cost allocated = $30,000
Explanation:
This relates to overhead absorption. The manufacturing overhead rate is calculated as budgeted manufacturing overhead divided by budgeted direct labour hour.
Manufacturing overhead allocated = manufacturing overhead rate x actual labour hour for each department for the job.
Answer: D. The neighbor, because obtaining financing was a condition precedent.
Explanation:
Even though it wasn't listed in the written contract, there was the condition precedent that the contract would not be binding unless funding was obtained. Condition precedent is a condition that must happen for a contract to become enforceable.
Funding was not obtained so the contract cannot be enforced. The neighbor would therefore prevail so long as the owner admits that there was indeed a condition precedent.
