You want to isolate the x-term from the constant term, so you can subtract x/3 and add 10. This gives you
... 4/9x -10 -x/3 +10 > x/3 -12 -x/3 +10
... 1/9x > -2 . . . . . . collect terms
Now, you can multiply by 9 to see the condition on x.
... 9(1/9x) > -2(9)
... x > -18
On the x-y plane, the graph of this will be a dashed line at x=-18, and the half-plane to the right of that line will be shaded.
On a number line, there will be an open circle at x=-18, and the number line to the right of that circle will be marked (bold, colored, shaded, whatever).
You use rise over run. So you first count the rise( how many upwards is the point) then count the run( how many to the right or left is the point)
Answer:
the answer is 2279.35
Step-by-step explanation:
its on the smartest app
Answer:
yes correct
Step-by-step explanation:
given
5x ≥ 3x + 4 ( subtract 3x from both sides )
2x ≥ 4 ( divide both sides by 2 )
x ≥ 2 ← is the solution to the inequality
The only value greater than 2 is 3
Consider the charge for parking one car for t hours.
If t is more than 1, then the function is y=3+2(t-1), because 3 $ are payed for the first hour, then for t-1 of the left hours, we pay 2 $.
If t is one, then the rule y=3+2(t-1) still calculates the charge of 3 $, because substituting t with one in the formula yields 3.
75% is 75/100 or 0.75.
For whatever number of hours t, the charge for the first car is 3+2(t-1) $, and whatever that expression is, the price for the second car and third car will be
0.75 times 3+2(t-1). Thus, the charge for the 3 cars is given by:
3+2(t-1)+0.75[3+2(t-1)]+0.75[3+2(t-1)]=3+2(t-1)+<span>0.75 × 2[3 + 2(t − 1)].
Thus, the function which total parking charge of parking 3 cars for t hours is:
</span><span>f(t) = (3 + 2(t − 1)) + 0.75 × 2(3 + 2(t − 1))
Answer: C</span>
