Hello. You did not present the map to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, taking into account the historical context of the partition of India and the context of the response options, we can consider that the option selected above, is the correct answer, because it is a fact.
The partition of India occurred after the country became independent from the British Empire. At that time, the country had difficulties in maintaining political and governmental order, in addition to suffering a strong religious crisis, which was what was the great trigger for the division of India into two countries: India and Pakistan.
Pakistan was dominated by Muslim forces, which forced a large number of Hindu citizens to migrate to India, where they could practice their religion without suffering any reprisals.
“One of the strangest controversies in the history of Orientalism turned upon the “origin of bhakti”, as if devotion had at some given moment been a new idea and thenceforth a fashionable one. It would have been simpler to observe that the word bhakti means primarily a given share, and therefore also the devotion or love that all liberality presupposes; and so that inasmuch as one “gives God his share” (bhagam), i.e. sacrifces, one is his bhakta. Thus in the hymn, “If thou givest me my share” amounts to saying “If thou lovest me”. It has often been pointed out that the Sacrifice was thought of as a commerce between Gods and men: but not often realised that by introducing into traditional conceptions of trade notions derived from our own internecine commercial transactions, we have falsified our understanding of the original sense of such a commerce, which was actually more of the potlatsh type, a competition in giving, than like our competitions in taking.
In general, yes, state governments are, for the most part, set up the same as the federal government, since there are state executives, legislatures, and judiciaries.
My answer would be yes, the Committee of Public Safety protected the Revolution from its enemies. It enabled to put country under threat of death penalty to work together. How beneficial was Committee of Public Safety to the revolution was already debated in 1790's; however, it is necessary to say that it was a collective dictatorship in the time of need when country faced civil wars, external invasion, and counter-revolution.
Hello,
it was John Adams who said that
