Answer:
Regional inequality and reducing the economic, social and religious discrimination;the country has transformed into a federal structure as a result.
Explanation:
Due to the proximity of the local government to the people, the federal context provides fertile ground for more efficient budgeting and needs-based and evidence-based health from provincial and local government.
Answer:
The South benefited by keeping slave labor. The North did not.
Explanation:
The South relied on old money and land and power handed down through generations. The main industry of landowners was extensive arable farming. This required a high volume of manual labor. However, paying labor and fair working condition and equal rights would have reduced the labor and reduced a land owner’s capacity to make a profit. Slaves provided labor. The North developed a free-labor industrial economy. This benefited from manufacturing but also benefited from the employees to be able to spend money and make money for themselves and aid economic growth for the entire country.
Answer: The pope alluded to this statement by Martin Luther.
Explanation:
This is how the pope metaphor addressed Martin Luther. Pope Leo X issued a papal proclamation in which he compared this Christian reformer to an animal because of the actions of Martin Luther.
The pope wrote in his announcement that the wild beast was treading on the vineyard of the church and was trying to destroy it. In this statement, the pope meant Luther but also all his followers.
Answer:
The types of energy used in the United States have changed over time. The change has been driven by advances in technology, energy resource discoveries, energy prices, social pressures and other factors. The only constant is that the amount of energy used has increased steadily over time.
Explanation:
hope this helps:)
Answer:
Marat was a French journalist who suffered from a deteriorating skin disease that obliged him to spend most of his time inside a bathtub. However, this did not stop him from being one of the most respected voices among the radical groups of the revolution.
He made such claims because he was, along with Robespierre, the most noteworthy radical figure of the Revolution. Marat actively called for the murder of the King and the royal family, and the murder of all of the nobles and political prisoners who supported the king and the Ancient Regime.
In the end, he was successful because the royal family was beheaded, as well as many political prisoners. However, he was himself killed by a loyalist peasant, who stabbed him to death while he was on his bathtub.
