This doesn't occur before the formal operational stage.
According to Jean Piaget, a Swiss psychologist, every person goes through 4 developmental stages:
- sensorimotor : birth - 24 months
- preoperational: 24 months - age 7
- concrete operational: 7 - 14
- formal operational: adolescence - adulthood
Only when we reach the final stage of development can we put ourselves in somebody else's shoes and see things from their perspective, according to Piaget.
Answer:
a. It is the satisfaction gained from being in a group that stands for what a person believes in.
Explanation:
An incentive that comes from taking part in sharing beliefs and opinions in a given issue will be considered a purposive incentive:
Members experience satisfaction for being part of a group that promotes their interest and reflects their lifestyle and values.
The groups will have an ideological commitment like: gay rights activists, environmental activists and civil libertarians.
The members will find a sense of belonging in the group and will feel that their voice is expressed through a community that shares their stand on the issues they try to promote.
Answer:
Bearing in mind that it was Davidson that recommended the rope while stating the specific of the rope. The specifics of the rope would be considered facts, it is this facts that the court would find to be bounded to the warranty. On his part, Moon only stated the fact that he needs rope for his farm, but does not specify what he needs it for. The recommendation by Davidson for that specific rope is based only on the details that it would be used for the farm. This is pointing that, Moon is relying entirely on the seller, who knows about the product, to recommend him a type of rope.
However, there is need to put into consideration that Moon does not specify the exact use of the rope. This implies that Davidson states the he recommends the use of that specific rope.
With the argument back and forth between seller and buyer, there is no warranty at the instance that the seller breached an implied warranty of merchantability, but one can argue there was a
breach of implied warranty of particular purpose if it is taken into consideration that the use of that particular rope is not usually used in farms.
Explanation:
See answer
The answer should be the Radula