It takes 40 minutes more going up or 40/60 = 0.67 hours
more.
Let us say that:
t = the time required for him running down
t + 0.67 = time required for him running up
Since the distance of running up and down must be equal
therefore:
(3 miles / hr) * (t + 0.67) = (5 miles / h) * t
3 t + 2.01 = 5 t
2 t = 2.01
t = 1.005 hr
So the total length of the hike is:
length = 2 * (5 miles / hr) * (1.005 hr)
<span>length = 10.05 miles</span>
55° is equal to 0.9599 radians.
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1:
If an angle is represented in degrees, it will be of the form x°.
If an angle is represented in radians, it will be of the form
radians.
To convert degrees to radians, we multiply the degree measure by
.
For the conversion of degrees to radians,
the degrees in radians = (given value in degrees)(
).
Step 2:
To convert 50°,

radians.
So 55° is equal to 0.9599 radians.
Hi,
The answer is 3/2 or 4
How I got my answer:
Just think that (2x+3) OR (x-4) has to be 0.
<span>
Than you can find it out with a simple +/- calculation. </span>
<span> 2x+3=0 x-4=0
x=-3/2 or 4</span>Hope this helps you.
Answer:
Sample mean from population A has probably more accurate estimate of its population mean than the sample mean from population B.
Step-by-step explanation:
To yield a more accurate estimate of the population mean, margin of error should be minimized.
margin of error (ME) of the mean can be calculated using the formula
ME=
where
- z is the corresponding statistic in the given confidence level(z-score or t-score)
- s is the standard deviation of the sample (or of the population if it is known)
for a given confidence level, and the same standard deviation, as the sample size increases, margin of error decreases.
Thus, random sample of 50 people from population A, has smaller margin of error than the sample of 20 people from population B.
Therefore, sample mean from population A has probably more accurate estimate of its population mean than the sample mean from population B.
Answer:
The triangles can be congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
They are congruent if proven by SSS: 2 sides are clearly stated that they are congruent due to the marks they have.
The last side can be congruent if the diagonals are congruent in length by proving.
They can also be congeuent due to SAS because there is gonna be alternate interior angles due to the transversal.