SIMILARITIES
<span>-Both have an instruction for judges, police officers, and witnesses </span>
<span>-Both set regulations and establish wages and prices </span>
<span>-Both punished criminals </span>
<span>-Both had a certain set of right </span>
<span>DIFFERENCES </span>
<span>-US constitution allows more leniency and freedom to it's American citizens like freedom of speech and religion. The Code of Hammurabi (COH) does not. </span>
<span>-COH was very barbaric compared to US constitution </span>
<span>[e.g.) If a man kills another man's son his son shall be cut off. </span>
<span>-If a son slaps his father, his hand shall be cut off.] --->>> These things DO not exist in the constitution. </span>
That statement is false.
Even though it is true that the right to privacy is not directly stated in the constitution, some amendments were made to make sure it is stay protected. For example, Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) protects a person's health information and <span>Federal Trade Commission (FTC) protects' company privacy in making its financial statement</span>
Under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, when assessing whether a governmental action has infringed on an individual's rights, the court must balance both, but ultimately grant the government the ability to do whatever it deems necessary.
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. No warrants shall be issued without the reasonable cause.
It upholds the security of the individuals against the subjective invasion by the government and its officials. Privacy protection is ensured. The government must take step in a balanced manner so that the privacy rights are not crossed and the security of the individual is ensured.
-Strong military forces
- Increase in trade
-Alliances among small villages (alliances with the Romans)