Answer:
The explanation is given below
Explanation:
If Jason puts away $200 per month in savings, the money saved (y) in x months is given by the equation: y = 200x.
Jason collects a loan of $750 and pays with no interest if he pays $100 per month. Therefore in x months, Jason would have paid 100x as part of the $750 loan.
The money remaining for Jason to pay after x months is given as: 750 - 100x.
To figure out when his savings will equal the remaining amount he owes on the television, the money saved (y) in x months is to be equal to The money remaining for Jason to pay after x months. That is:
750 - 100x = 200x
200x + 100x = 750
300x = 750
x = 750/300
x = 2.5 months
In order to answer this question, I will use two different perspectives of ethics: the consequentialist perspective, and the deontological perspective.
Consequentialism argues that the morality of an action lies with its consequences. This means that an action with bad consequences is an immoral action, and vice versa. In this case, killing the last remaining Redwood would not have any negative consequence on any being in the world, as no one benefits from it anymore. This means that the act is not immoral.
A deontological perspective states that there are principles that should be taken as rules, and which govern what is right and what is wrong. Therefore, rules and duties are central. For example, a principle might state that "all life is valuable." As the Redwood falls under the definition of life, killing it would be considered an immoral action.
The Civil war
Bc it was the start of something New. Everything kinda sorta changed after that
