Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Answer: The answer is D
D because they had many scarce materials so they had to shift the process to war needs.
Debt
?
?
I think, but im not sure.
Answer:
theres no visual for this but the main components are the mouth, stomach and intestines
The one who is responsible for scheduling the bills for the floor debate in the senate is the Senate Majority Leader.
So before the bills scheduling, each party will choose / elects a senate party leader to represent them.
These senate majority leaders later will be responsible to control the agenda of the debate floor
