The correct answer is option "b", "<span>The Johnsons increased their liquid assets".
</span><span>The inquiry is giving us the accompanying situation: "so as to reduce their debt, the Johnson's sold some land property esteemed at $165,000 for $143,000. They paid off an advance adjust of $100,000 and put the rest in investment funds." We can see that they really lost cash - they got for the house not as much as the house is worth - they diminished their net esteem. Be that as it may, they have more money that they can utilize (the investment funds) - this is called liquid assets, so the right answer is b, The Johnsons expanded their liquid assets.
</span>
Let x be the number of coins bert had
let y be the number of coins georgia has
x+3 =2y equation 1
x-4 = y equation 2
now, since y=x-4, you can put that in the first equation
it becomes x+3= 2(x-4) right because y is the same thing as x but you can't solve for 2 letters so we have to make them the same.
so your new equation is x+3 = 2(x-4)
expand so you get x+3= 2x -8
then solve for x by putting the x's on one side and the numbers on the other
bring x over --- 3= 2x- 8 - x and subtract the xs to get 3= x-8
then bring the 8 to the other side
3+ 8 = x
x= 11
note: remember! when you're bringing numbers and letters to the other side, you have to reverse the operation: say you have x+1 = 2 --- when bringing the one over to the other side it becomes a -1 ---- x+1= 2-1
so bert has 11 cents.
this question is a little difficult, it takes some practice and it's stuff you'll learn in high school so don't worry too much if you don't get it
((-4x^3)(y^4))^-3
--------------------------
(2xy^4)^-4
16x^4y^16
=------------------------
-64x^9y^12
-16y^4
=------------------------
64x^5
-y
=------------------------
4x^5
So the final answer is:
-y^4
-------
4x^5
(Btw if "^" is in front of a number, that means it is an exponent, so when your writing this on paper, just write it as a regular exponent without the "^". I had to do that since I'm on a computer.)
Hopefully this was helpful in some way.
Answer:
4.0
Step-by-step explanation:
There are no prime numbers that equal 14. In fact, in the entire world of
mathematics, there is only one single number that equals 14. The number
is . . . . . . . . . . . . (wait for it) . . . . . . . . . . . . . (here it comes) . . . . . . . . . <em>14</em>.
And that number is not a prime one.
It's possible to <em><u>multiply</u></em> some prime numbers and produce 14 :
Like this . . . . . . . . . . 2 x 7 = 14
It's possible to <em><u>add</u></em> some prime numbers and produce 14 :
Like this . . . . . . . . . . 3 + 11 = 14
or 7 + 7 = 14
It's possible to <em><u>subtract</u></em> some prime numbers and produce 14 :
Like this . . . . . . . . . . 17 - 3 = 14
or 19 - 5 = 14
or 31 - 17 = 14 .
But it's not possible to divide any prime numbers and produce 14,
and there's no single prime number that's equal to 14.