Yes, because now I have read this and want to know what your project is about!
It captures my attention.
Its the exclamation mark;)
Answer:
Zenith Public School,
Ashok Vihar,
New Delhi, India.
20th July, 2020
The Globe Tours and Travel,
235 Nehru Place,
New Delhi, India.
TERMS FOR CONDUCTED TOURS
I, Varsha Malhotra, the head girl of the above named school wish to contact you to make inquiries about the terms of a tour we are going to embark on. Our history teacher is organizing a tour for us in-order to show us historical sites at Agra, Jaipur and Chandigarh.
Based on this fact, I would like to know about the terms of service for the tour we are to be embarked on in-order to plan ourselves. How much would it take to convey 60 students to those places using your company's deluxe bus? The fare for the trip, boarding? And, also, do you have lodging in those places and how much does it cost per night for each person?
Additionally, we would like to know the total time the trip will take as well as the mode of payment for the trip? Do your company accept cash or can we pay through cheque?
Thank you as I look forward to your reply to my questions.
Yours sincerely,
Varsha Malhotra.
Explanation:
Answer:
Because we are sisters, our memories are inextricably linked to each other.
Explanation:
The word inextricably can be understood as a bond or connection that cannot be distinguished or separated. Here, the sentence that used the word 'inextricably' correctly is 'Because we are sisters, our memories are inextricably linked to each other.'
This is because we know that sisters normally share a bond that is intrinsic and inborn. So using the word 'inextricably' in this sentence makes it more meaningful as it can connect the the idea that 'sisters are indeed inseparable' and share a bond that is indistinguishable.
Answer:
If an analytical essay on expository text mentions that the test has too much _overstatement_, then the essayist might be saying that the author is stating his opinion too strongly.
Answer:
The first narrator is very different from Simon Wheeler in a number of ways, including style, his superior understanding and use of grammar and syntax, his address of the reader directly, and his tongue-in-cheek manner. Moreover, he is skeptical about the story that Wheeler tells.
