The Great Compromise of the Constitution resulted in the

History

2 answers:

mylen [45]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The Connecticut Commitment of 1787 in the United States, also known as the Great Compromise, originated in the creation of legislative bodies. He joined the Virginia Plan that favored population-based representation, and the New Jersey Plan, which listed each state as an equal. Roger Sherman of Connecticut played an important role in building this commitment.

It established a bicameral system: one chamber in favor of the Virginia Plan, based on the population of the States, and the other in accordance with the New Jersey Plan, by which all States voted in equality.

This was an important issue in the new United States. The small States, with a small population, wanted their voices to be heard in the US government, as well as those of large states with a large population, such as Virginia or New York. With his plan, Virginia wanted to have greater representation because a large percentage of the US population was in that state. In this way they would have control over what happened in the United States.

AveGali [126]3 years ago

6 0

The house of representations and the senate

You might be interested in

As a result of European expansion into Africa, a. internal conflict among native African groups was intensified. b. North Africa

kari74 [83]

Answer:

a. internal conflict among native African groups was intensified.

Explanation:

European expansion into Africa, from the activities of the explorers, through the era of slave trade until the period of colonial occupation intensified conflict among native Africans.

This internal conflict was more pronounced during the slave trade when African rulers will need to war against neighbouring villages in order to capture them as slaves to be sold to the European traders in exchange for foreign commodities.

6 0

3 years ago

What two leading theories explain how the first humans came to the Americas?

Anettt [7]

Either they crossed over the land bridge following their food, or they were moving by means of water across the Bering strait

6 0

3 years ago

What do historians hope to achieve when they make historical arguments?

MArishka [77]

Answer:

they wan to acheive what they want to find out and they also wan to acheive what actually happedned

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Question 1 (1 point)

Galina-37 [17]

I have no clue about this one

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the Kremlin's preferred narrative of Russian history? And, why doesn't

Vikki [24]

Answer:

The long reach of the past seems to in any case to be causing the Kremlin some uneasiness. The impacts of the interruption related with the October Upheaval and the resulting arrangement of the Soviet Association infiltrated all aspects of Russian life. A profound association with the past is as yet felt by numerous conventional Russians. I caught a lady in her mid sixties indignantly taking steps to cast a ballot against Vladimir Putin in the impending races since he wouldn't commend the October Unrest. These sentiments are subsiding, however gradually, writes Alexander Nekrassov.

The centennial year of the October Upset showed that the Kremlin is dismissing the Soviet progressive heritage. The Russian state, itself to a great extent a progressive heritage, likes to see in 1917 examination material to evaluate and to gain from. The authority approach currently is to instruct another age of Russians who never commended the October Transformation.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago