This is true. The closer to the mean that a value is, the more likely it is to occur.
In this case, two and three standard deviations away are both fairly unlikely, however, two is still more likely to occur than three.
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer:
B hope this helps!
Step-by-step explanation:
Trust <3
Answer:
35 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
You add up all of the miles on the chart to get 35 miles. Have a great day! I hope this helped.