Okay I think there has been a transcription issue here because it appears to me there are two answers. However I can spot where some brackets might be missing, bear with me on that.
A direct variation, a phrase I haven't heard before, sounds a lot like a direct proportion, something I am familiar with. A direct proportion satisfies two criteria:
The gradient of the function is constant s the independent variable (x) varies
The graph passes through the origin. That is to say when x = 0, y = 0.
Looking at these graphs, two can immediately be ruled out. Clearly A and D pass through the origin, and the gradient is constant because they are linear functions, so they are direct variations.
This leaves B and C. The graph of 1/x does not have a constant gradient, so any stretch of this graph (to y = k/x for some constant k) will similarly not be direct variation. Indeed there is a special name for this function, inverse proportion/variation. It appears both B and C are inverse proportion, however if I interpret B as y = (2/5)x instead, it is actually linear.
This leaves C as the odd one out.
I hope this helps you :)
2.4<7
2.4 / 0.6 = 4
2.4 / 2.4 = 1
4.8<7
4.8 / 0.6 = 8
4.8 / 2.4 = 2
Answer:
105 feet cubed
Step-by-step explanation:
1/2 cubed is 0.125 Since there are 840 wooden blocks, .125x840 is 105 feet cubed
Answer:
the top left picture is a function
Step-by-step explanation:
it is a function because the line does not go over the same x-value more then once.
Answer:
Please see the attached picture for the full solution.
