Answer:
to be or not to be?to be or not to be?to be or not to be?to be or not to be?to be or not to be?to be or not to be?to be or not to be?
Explanation:
This question is an example of the fallacy of correlation and causation.
The fallacy exists due to the fact that human beings like to find cause and effects towards the things that to not exist.
So they have to fabricate patterns that would end up making two different variables and situations to be closely similar.
Read more on fallacy here:
brainly.com/question/20939336
The impact of migration from 2010 to 2017 created a large increase in immigrants in the continents of Africa and Europe.
During 2010-17 due to the expansion of population there was growth of slums and asylums.
- Most of the sub-Saharan moved to the European Union nations such as Norway and Sweden. Thus an over a seven-year period these refugees Most of the migrants came from Nigeria, Ghana, and Kenya.
- The possible impacts that the migrants made were seen in terms of financial support and gains.
Hence option B is correct, as more emigrants sent money home, this money helped in the growth of their country of origin.
Learn more about the From 2010 through 2017 there was a large increase in the number of migrants from Africa to Europe.
brainly.com/question/24814483.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
The study that Dr. Keyes wants to do is a study that uses two variables (pets and happiness). Dr. Keyes wishes to prove the cause and effect relationship between these two variables that prove that the greater the amount of pets (causes) people have, the greater the happiness of these people (effect). For this reason, we can say that Dr. Keyes is not doing a correlational study.
This is because, although the correlational study wishes to observe the relationship between two variables, this study cannot be applied to cause and effect relationships.
