Answer:
I would say B.
Explanation:
A would only fix biodiversity temporarily, until humans come and wipe them out again. C is just kind of impossible, and containing them could also be problematic. D is also unreasonable, and some animals would not be able to thrive in new ecosystems. B would help save the environment, which would save the animals, which would help biodiversity.
Answer:
First,the sun transferes heat to the plants,helping them grow.Animals such as deer who would eat grass,eat plants.
Explanation:
The most plausible hypothesis is: Tropical regions generally have more available water and higher levels of solar radiation. They also have very high rates of immigration and very low rates of extinction.
explanation:
Water is essential for an abundance of life, and sunlight is the means by which the whole food chain receives energy. Plants convert the sunlight into food, herbivores eat them, and other animals eat herbivores.
Hope this helps, and muchas luck on your biology.
Whelp, it is definitely not D.
I would say B.
there was no Paleogene period.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Coal is majorly used to produces electricity. The coal is ignited and the heat produced used to heat water to steam. The steam is then used to drive turbines with a dynamo effect to produce electricity. Turning off lights when not in use reduces the demand for electricity hence reducing the amount of coal needed to meet this demand.
Other ways to conserve energy is using bulbs with low energy demand - such as LEDs - and improving natural lighting indoors.
