1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
chubhunter [2.5K]
3 years ago
7

In 1 or 2 sentences, explain how quantity supplied and price are related.

Social Studies
1 answer:
nydimaria [60]3 years ago
6 0
When there is more of a product, the price is lowered because the product is not in short supply. However, if there is very little of the product, the price will increase because it is harder to get one's hands on that product because of its scarcity.
You might be interested in
The largest numbers of europeans migrated to the united states primarily because of
KIM [24]

Answer:

Economic factors.

Explanation:

  • A large number of the European migrated to the America in search of the job opportunities and considered to be about 20% of the migration. While others migrated for the political stability and form 1500 to mid 20th century about 65 million left Europe.
4 0
3 years ago
Explain the role of social media in the violation of human rights and give examples?
BabaBlast [244]

it can be racial and fast to commment on hatred post on media and can affect bonds and any other relation to people

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What term is used to describe an individual's money and personal property?
gayaneshka [121]

I believe the answer is: Assets

Assets would include everything of value that is owned by a certain individual or organisation. Assets is a critical component to calculate our net worth, which being done by calculating total assets - total liabilities. Examples of assets are cash, land, supplies, receivables, etc.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the constitution grant congress the power to create "inferior courts���? the builders of the constitution ensured the ex
Neko [114]
Congress and the Judiciary Act of 1789<span>

When the First Congress turned to the organization of the judicial branch, much of the debate centered on whether to establish lower federal courts or to rely on existing state courts to exercise federal jurisdiction. Advocates of a strong central government thought a national system of federal courts was an essential requirement for energetic government. Other members of Congress, recalling the colonial experience under British rule, thought that justice was best served by courts tied to local communities. Those who were suspicious of the concentration of national power wanted to grant state courts authority to hear all cases involving federal law or to limit local federal courts to admiralty and maritime law. The judiciary act approved in September 1789 established a federal court system with broad jurisdiction, but the act reserved a significant role for state courts and guaranteed that the diversity of legal traditions throughout the country would be recognized in the local federal courts.

The Judiciary Act of 1789 established three types of federal courts. The Supreme Court, with a chief justice and five associate justices, would meet twice a year in the nation’s capital and hear appeals from lower federal courts and from the state supreme courts. The Supreme Court would also exercise the limited original jurisdiction defined by the Constitution. In each state and in Kentucky and Maine (then parts of other states), a district court with a single judge would have exclusive jurisdiction to hear cases involving admiralty and maritime law and conduct trials of minor federal crimes. The district courts shared with the state courts jurisdiction over small suits brought by the United States.

The most important federal cases would be initiated in the third type of court, called circuit courts, which would convene in the same judicial districts in which the district courts met. The circuit courts had no judges of their own, but were served by two Supreme Court justices and the local district judge. (Congress soon revised the law to require only one justice on each circuit court.) Congress grouped the judicial districts into regional circuits for the purpose of assigning justices to serve on the circuit courts within that region. The circuit courts would hear some appeals from the district courts, but they were primarily trial courts. The circuit courts had exclusive jurisdiction over serious federal crimes and shared with the state courts jurisdiction over suits involving disputes above a certain monetary value, suits involving the U.S. government, and suits between citizens of different states.

Congress protected distinctive state legal traditions by drawing the judicial districts to coincide with state boundaries and by providing for the use of the respective state’s rules for most district and circuit court proceedings and for the selection of federal juries. Perhaps most important for protection of regional legal cultures, the assignment of “circuit riding” duties for Supreme Court justices ensured that the judges on the nation’s highest court would learn about local legal procedures and would interact with citizens at the point where cases entered the federal judicial system. The Judiciary Act also promoted a local orientation of the lower courts by requiring district judges to live in the district where they served. In response to widespread concerns that defendants in federal trials would be forced to appear in distant courts, the Judiciary Act required civil trials to be held in the district in which a defendant was served with a writ and trials involving the death penalty to be held in the county where the crime occurred.

I hope all this helps I am taking judicial law in school .
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
The court ruled that the plaintiffs in the brown v board of education case were deprived of the equal protection of the laws gua
kotegsom [21]

In Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court ruled that the plaintiffs were denied their equal protection rights in the<u> 14th Amendment. </u>

<h3>What was the case of Brown v. Board of Education about?</h3>

It related to the practice of segregating public schools in the South.

After going through state courts, it made it to the Supreme Court as it concerned a Constitutional issue.

The Supreme Court ruled that the plaintiffs in this case, by being segregated, were not being equally protected by the law and so declared segregation to be unconstitutional.

In conclusion, this relates to the 14th Amendment.

Find out more on the 14th Amendment at brainly.com/question/1600110.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did it mean to say that the people’s natural rights are “inalienable”?
    13·1 answer
  • Who controlled the Holy Land in 1095?
    7·2 answers
  • 1. How did the Industrial Revolution help lead to European imperialism?
    14·2 answers
  • Most traditional definitions of _____ center around the notion that it is the sum of the values, rituals, symbols, beliefs, and
    14·1 answer
  • What psychological school of thought was most concerned with the influence of the general principles of learning on an organism'
    12·1 answer
  • Jaden took his SAT tests last year and scored well above average. He is planning to go to graduate school, so he knows he will h
    13·1 answer
  • The judgment process weighed heart against the feather of truth &amp; justice.<br> True or False
    7·1 answer
  • What famous words did Patrick Henry use in his speech about independence from Britain? a Give me liberty or give me death. b Giv
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is MOST negatively affected by a low national literacy rate?
    10·2 answers
  • Which community of interest is responsible for the security of the facility in which the organization is housed and the policies
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!