1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oduvanchick [21]
3 years ago
13

Why did the U.S. bomb Iraq and Saddam Hussein in 1998?

History
1 answer:
choli [55]3 years ago
6 0
The main reason why the U.S. bombed Iraq and Saddam Hussein in 1998 was that "<span>B. He refused to comply with U.N. weapons inspectors," since it was feared that he was creating and stockpiling large amounts of dangerous weapons. </span>
You might be interested in
Which one of the following statements is most accurate for law enforcement? A. Law enforcement agencies are employed by the cour
Vitek1552 [10]

I believe the answer is: C. Law enforcement officers are mainly required to uphold the law.

Because of this the scope of action which can and cannot be done by law enforcement is limited in a very strict regulation. If the law enforcement disobey this limitation, the suspect could even sue the law enforcement and all of the charge can be nullified.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
By the end of the 1800's, the use of vertical and horizontal consolidation, not to mention trusts resulted in
lesya [120]

Here's link to the answer:

tinyurl.com/wtjfavyw

7 0
3 years ago
What role did government and politics play in the advent and evolution of the Cold War during the 20th century?
HACTEHA [7]
Western democracies had always been hostile to the idea of a communist state. The United States had refused recognition to the USSR for 16 years after the Bolshevik takeover. I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Texas leaders and Comanches meet in early 1840?what happened as a result of this meeting
Soloha48 [4]
A peace policy that utilized trade and gifts to promote friendship and authorized military force only to punish specific acts of aggression was inaugurated and remained in effect, with varying degrees of success, for the remainder of Spanish rule in Texas. The first success of the new Spanish policy came <span>in 1762, when Fray José Calahorra y Saenz negotiated a treaty with the Comanches, who agreed not to make war on missionized Apaches. Continued Apache aggression made it impossible for the Comanches to keep their promise, and ultimately led Spanish officials to advocate a Spanish-Comanche alliance aimed at exterminating the Apaches. That policy was officially implemented in 1772, and with the help of Athanase de Mézières, a French trader serving as Spanish diplomat, a second treaty was signed with the Comanches. The Comanche chief Povea signed the treaty in 1772 at San Antonio, thereby committing his band to peace with the Spaniards. Other bands, however, continued to raid Spanish settlements. Comanche attacks escalated in the early 1780s, and Spanish officials feared the province of Texas would be lost. To avoid that possibility, the governor of Texas, Domingo Cabello y Robles, was instructed to negotiate peace with the warring Comanches. He dispatched Pedro Vial and Francisco Xavier de Chaves to Comanchería with gifts and proposals for peace. The mission was successful, and the emissaries returned to San Antonio with three principal Comanche chiefs who were authorized by their people to make peace with the Spanish. The result was the Spanish-Comanche Treaty of 1785, a document that Comanches honored, with only minor violations, until the end of the century. As Spanish power waned in the early years of the nineteenth century, officials were unable to supply promised gifts and trade goods, and Comanche aggression once again became commonplace. Comanches raided Spanish settlements for horses to trade to Anglo-American traders entering Texas from the United States. Those Americans furnished the Comanches with trade goods, including arms and ammunition, and provided a thriving market for Comanche horses.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Consider the chronology described. How could something like the Holocaust
Allisa [31]

Answer:

I Don't Know

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Identify the different groups that supported napoleon and why
    13·1 answer
  • During the late 1800s, the Chinese immigration rate
    13·1 answer
  • Please help i confused ill mark brainlyest
    5·2 answers
  • In what era did hunter-gatherer societies thrive?<br> Paleolithic<br> Mesolithic<br> Neolithic
    9·2 answers
  • Paid, professional soldiers are called: viziers serfs vassals mercenaries
    11·1 answer
  • The use of knowledge to solve practical problems is what
    13·1 answer
  • What's the best definition for mercantilism ​
    6·1 answer
  • The North and South each had their own advantages and disadvantages.
    15·2 answers
  • Down:
    6·1 answer
  • Should the Confederate leaders be allowed to participate in their state’s government? Explain your answer.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!