1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xz_007 [3.2K]
3 years ago
12

Bem-vindo à Seção 3! Na audiência UNA (única), que ocorreu no dia 2/2/2020, às 9h, ambas as partes compareceram acompanhadas de

seus advogados. Constou na ata de audiência que seriam intimadas acerca da prolação da sentença. Assim, foi publicado despacho em 2/3/2020, cientificando as partes da decisão de primeiro grau. Diante do exposto, leia a sentença a seguir transcrita, na qualidade de advogado da Lanchonete Dois Irmãos LTDA. EPP, e identifique a peça processual que pode ser utilizada para combater a decisão proferida. PODER JUDICIÁRIO JUSTIÇA DO TRABALHO TRIBUNAL REGIONAL DO TRABALHO DA 3ª REGIÃO 10ª VARA DO TRABALHO DE BELO HORIZONTE/MG RTOrd nº RECLAMANTE: JORGE DOS ANJOS RECLAMADO: LANCHONETE DOIS IRMÃOS LTDA. EPP SENTENÇA 1 RELATÓRIO O trabalhador Jorge dos Anjos ajuizou a reclamação trabalhista (nº do processo) em face da Lanchonete Dois Irmãos LTDA. EPP., alegando que foi contratado em 4/12/2017 e laborado até 28/6/2019, seu último dia de cumprimento do aviso prévio trabalhadoAlega que foi contratado para exercer as funções de atendente, auferindo remuneração mensal de R$ 1.500,00 (mil e quinhentos reais), com uma jornada das 8h às 13h15min, de segunda a sexta- feira. Todavia, alega que estendia sua jornada, em média, 1 (uma) hora por dia, terminando o expediente sempre às 14h15min, não tendo recebido qualquer valor pelo labor extraordinário. Afirma, ainda, que tinha que chegar na reclamada com 15 (quinze) minutos de antecedência para se uniformizar, período este que também não era remunerado. Diante do elastecimento da jornada pelas horas extras prestadas, ou seja, por ser superior a 6 (seis) horas diárias, assevera que tinha direito a intervalo intrajornada de 1 (uma) hora, mas que lhe eram concedidos somente 15 (quinze) minutos. Por fim, o trabalhador destaca que recebia mensalmente uma parcela denominada “prêmio”, no valor de R$ 100,00 (cem reais). Esse pagamento era feito todos os meses, independentemente do desempenho profissional do trabalhador. Dessa forma, requer que integre a remuneração repercutindo em FGTS, contribuição previdenciária, férias e décimo terceiro salário, assim como componha a base de cálculo das horas extras pleiteadas no presente feito. Requer, ainda, o deferimento da justiça gratuita e a condenação da reclamada em honorários advocatícios (art. 791- A, CLT). Atribuiu à causa o valor de (R$). Juntou documentos. Citada, a reclamada compareceu à audiência. Proposta a conciliação, não foi aceita. A reclamada apresentou contestação por meio eletrônico, aduzindo que não é verídica a alegação de que o obreiro laborava até 14h15min. Para tanto, junta aos autos os cartões de ponto de todo o período contratual. A empresa contesta o pedido de tempo à disposição ao fundamento de que o trabalhador podia se uniformizar em casa. No tocante ao intervalo intrajornada, pugna pela correta concessão de 15 (quinze) minutos a este título, haja vista que a jornada não ultrapassava 6 (seis) horas diárias. Por fim, requer a improcedência do pedido de integração do pagamento feito sob a rubrica “prêmio”, invocando o art. 457, § 2º, da CLT. Impugna o pagamento de honorários advocatícios. Fixados os pontos controvertidos e definido o ônus da prova, consensualmente, procedeu-se à oitiva das partes e de uma testemunha de cada parte. Como declararam que não desejavam produzir outras provas, encerrou-se a instrução. Alegações finais remissivas. Renovada a tentativa de conciliação, não foi aceita. 2 FUNDAMENTAÇÃO
Law
1 answer:
Serga [27]3 years ago
8 0

Incomplete and unclear question, however I inferred you need a l

clear rendering of the text.

Explanation:

Here's the clear rendering;

Welcome to Section 3! At the UNA hearing (single), which took place on 2/2/2020, at 9:00 am, both parties appeared accompanied by their lawyers. The minutes of the hearing stated that they would be summoned about the sentence being rendered. Thus, an order was published on 2/3/2020, making the parties to the first degree decision aware.

In view of the above, read the following sentence, as a lawyer for Lanchonete Dois Irmãos LTDA. EPP, and identify the procedural document that can be used to combat the decision rendered.

JUDICIAL POWER JUSTICE OF LABOR REGIONAL COURT OF LABOR OF THE 3rd REGION 10TH WORK COURT OF BELO HORIZONTE / MG RTOrd CLAIM: JORGE DOS ANJOS CLAIMED: LANCHONETE DOIS IRMÃOS LTDA. EPP SENTENÇA 1 REPORT The worker Jorge dos Anjos filed a labor claim (case number) against Lanchonete Dois Irmãos LTDA. EPP., Alleging that he was hired on 12/4/2017 and worked until 6/28/2019, his last day of compliance with the previous notice worked.

He claims that he was hired to perform the duties of an attendant, earning monthly remuneration of R $ 1,500.00 (fifteen hundred reais), with a day from 8 am to 1:15 pm, from Monday to Friday.

However, he claims that he extended his journey, on average, 1 (one) hour a day, always ending the day at 2:15 pm, having not received any value for his extraordinary work. He also states that he had to arrive at the defendant 15 (fifteen) minutes in advance to get uniform, a period that was also unpaid.

In view of the length of the day for the overtime provided, that is, for being more than 6 (six) hours a day, he asserts that he was entitled to an intra-day break of 1 (one) hour, but that he was granted only 15 (fifteen) minutes

Finally, the worker points out that he received a monthly installment called "prize", in the amount of R $ 100.00 (one hundred reais). This payment was made every month, regardless of the worker's professional performance. Thus, it requires that it be included in the remuneration, reflecting FGTS, social security contributions, vacations and thirteenth salary, as well as making up the basis for calculating the overtime claimed in this case.

It also requires the granting of free justice and the conviction of the defendant in attorney's fees (art. 791- A, CLT). It attributed the value of (R $) to the cause. He gathered documents cited, the defendant attended the hearing. Conciliation proposal was not accepted. The defendant filed a dispute electronically, adding that the allegation that the worker was working until 2:15 pm is not true. To do so, add the time cards for the entire contractual period to the file. The company disputes the request for time available on the ground that the worker could be uniform at home. Regarding the intra-day break, he advocates the correct concession of 15 (fifteen) minutes in this regard, given that the journey did not exceed 6 (six) hours a day. Finally, it requires the dismissal of the request for integration of the payment made under the item “premium”, invoking art. 457, § 2, of the CLT. Challenges the payment of attorney fees.

Once the controversial points were fixed and the burden of proof was defined, consensually, the parties and a witness from each party were heard. As they stated that they did not wish to produce further evidence, the investigation was closed. Final remissive claims. The attempt at conciliation renewed, was not accepted. 2. RATIONALE

You might be interested in
Which term refers to team members who are available to augment the company in extreme circumstances when additional expertise an
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

the answer is "on call"

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
GOVERNMENT:
Katena32 [7]

Answer:

TRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUE

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which of these is not, according to your text, a
melomori [17]

Answer: B

Explanation: Inspecting the car is not typically apart of determining whether or not someone is under the influence unless they have unreasonable doubt that the driver is under the influence of something and they need to find out what incase it isn't alcohol

4 0
3 years ago
How long would this case be eligible for prosecution based on the new california law?
salantis [7]

Explanation:

The range is usually from one year for many misdemeanors, three years for many felonies, to no time limit at all for crimes that are punishable by death or by life in prison. If there is no statute of limitations, the prosecutor may bring charges against someone at any time.

5 0
2 years ago
Which type of agreements do some clients make their security agents sign?
zmey [24]

Answer: Confidentiality / Non-Disclosure agreements

Explanation:

We've all watched movies where people discuss very secretive things over the phone or with another person while they are being driven and at some point we wonder why those discussing are not worried about the driver spilling the beans.

The reason is because these high-profile clients need to protect their privacy and so make sure that those working for them especially their security agents, sign Non-Disclosure or Confidentiality agreements that require them not to speak of the things they hear or see about their clients.

Should they breach this agreement, they will be in a wealth of legal problems as well as suffer reputational loss. Sometimes though this does not seem to work and they still breach the agreement. It is a good deterrent either way.

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The typical first main phase in response to a research misconduct allegation is called:A. RemediationB. The adjudicationC. The a
    11·1 answer
  • What area of domestic policy does the security and exchange commission help regulate ?
    5·2 answers
  • Which option runs counter to the classical theory of criminology?
    15·1 answer
  • Individual evidence should be taken from
    8·1 answer
  • Why was it necessary for police officers in nineteenth-century Chicago to know Morse code?
    9·1 answer
  • What are two words that are used to describe Democrats
    5·1 answer
  • In 2014 the number of homicides was what percent of the total number of crimes reported
    15·1 answer
  • Me and my brother looked up why do we need to learn all these subjects but like we looked them up one by one and almost all of t
    13·1 answer
  • Which description of government most supports John Locke’s belief on the Social Contract Theory?
    7·2 answers
  • Here is the information Jordan has found about several different arson charges.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!