Answer:
An element that does not show trespass to realty is: d) Defendant refused to remove something he placed on the property after the owner asks him to remove it.
Explanation:
Trespass to realty means that a person traspass a property or an object that does not belong to him or her. Element D) wouldn't count as trespass because it doesn´t said the object was there without the initial permission of the owner.
The fair credit billing act and the electronic fund transfer act provide consumers with legal protection from unfair billing practices.
<h3>What are unfair billing practices?</h3>
Unfair billing practices refer to:
- Unauthorized credit card charges
- Charges due to errors
- Undelivered goods or services.
The accounts affected y the fair credit billing act and the electronic fund transfer act are credit accounts, including:
- Credit cards accounts
- Charge accounts.
Thus, the fair credit billing act and the electronic fund transfer act provide consumers with legal protection from unfair billing practices.
Learn more about unfair billing practices at brainly.com/question/1862829
Yes based on the intellectual property law and copyright in general.
Answer:
А. They may have to rely on former friends for transportation, putting them back in touch with the criminal world.
Explanation:
Being a criminal isn't an individual thing, rather it is really a group situation. For many offenders, their only friends are other criminals or those more likely to commit criminal acts. Thus, having only their friends to rely on for rides (Which is what most people will do) creates a risk of secondary deviance.
Answer:
See explaination
Explanation:
1. The Defensible Space Theory can really be seen as a logical explanation for controlling crime from the perspectives of a defender as well as an attacker. This theory makes use of the science of psychology with the science of meaningful space. When the defender, that is, the home owners will be responsible for their home space, the sense of responsibility will be higher on the same. The home owners will be accountable for their defense. This encourages home owners to design their home space in such a way that they will be able to control their environment based on their present capabilities like family structure, income level, and socioeconomic status. The attacker, that is, the potential criminal will feel insecure and uncomfortable on a highly defended land. So, the probability of the criminal attacking the home space or neighborhood may be lessened. This argument is supported by the study which involved private homes in two high-crime areas in St. Louis. These areas recorded lower crimes than public areas using the Defensible Space Theory.
2. According to the Routine Activity Theory, the condition for crime is the presence of a suitable target(s) and the absence of a guardian(s). It is important to note that something or the other will always be present to motivate potential offenders to commit crime. So, there will always be motivated offenders. If motivated offenders are present, so suitable targets will be present in the society on the other side for crime to take place. So, suitable targets cannot be left unguarded which will increase the probability of crime, considering the target is in an isolated position. Even a weak guardian is sometimes equivalent to no guardian or protector. So, I think, presence of guardian(s), more specifically, more capable guardian(s) plays the greatest role at reducing
