Answer:
A Place to stay
Explanation:
First he needs to find a place to stay as a homeless shelter if he has money in his bank he can rent an appartement or a hotel just till he can find a job if he dose not have money he can go to a homeless shelter.
Answer:
No because it violated the Commerce Clause.
Explanation:
As you may already know, the states that make up the US have the autonomy to formulate their own legislation that must be obeyed within state boundaries. However, even with its own legislation, each state is subject to federal laws, which must be obeyed by all. There is a federal law that prohibits states from violating trade clauses, so state laws should be made so as not to violate that federal law, for example.
There was no federal law dealing with truck mud flaps, so the state of Illinois decided to create its own legislation that required trucks to move around the state to use curved mud flaps because it guaranteed road safety. Although the state of Illinois intended to be good and there was no federal law barring that law, the state of Illinois violated a trade clause by preventing trucks from other states from unloading goods to local trade. For this reason, we can say that the statute formulated by the state of Illinois was not constitutional because it violated a federal clause.
Answer:
The exclusionary rule
Explanation:
the decision in Mappy v. Ohio declared that evidence that is obtained through an illegal search or seizure can not be used as evidence and must be excluded. This means that if an officer finds evidence of a crime on you but does not announce Miranda rights before searching you, then the evidence found from your crime can not be used against you in a court.
Misdemanors ( less serious then a felony)
