In 1st amendment which is people should have freedom of speech & no laws should be established based on religion. The United States is a free coin and we have freedom of speech so that has a lot to do with our lives today. The 2nd amendment is that security is necessary of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. This has a lot to do with today such as Polices and Swat. For the country to be safe in other words. 6th amendment has a lot to do with the jury and public trials, in all criminal prosecutions.
The economic decision that made consumer goods so difficult to get in the Soviet Union until the late 1980s was: <span>The emphasis on heavy industry
During that period, Soviet Union focus its economic forces to produce various heavy equipment in order to win the Space Race against united states. Because of this, the smaller industries receive no subsidies from the government, causing the price of any imported goods became heavily inflated.</span>
Mercantilism is really the idea that trade generates wealth, so i would have to say 3. establishment of subsistence agriculture
Noun
a follower of Hinduism.
adjective
relating to Hindus or Hinduism.
Roman society was one that constantly pushed romans to be more and more ambitious, to take more, do more and conquer more. Eventually you start stepping on people's toes who are trying to do the same thing, then you have two powerful people fighting for ultimate power (ceaser v. pompey, sulla v. marius, augustus v. marc anthony, etc.). Then there was the Marian reforms which made soldiers beholdened primarily to their general, not the state, for their rewards (usually land after the campaign was finished), couple that with legions frequently going further and further from Rome in the late republic, most Roman soldiers knew and depended on their general, and barely interacted with the state at all. So these generals gradually gained ferociously loyal armies that were closer to them than Rome in general, so they'd be pretty willing to fight for their general against another general, even when it would weaken the state as a whole. Obviously civil wars cause a huge amount of damage to their nation, both in lives and monetary cost. Plus usually whoever won the civil war would then proceed to kill all prominent citizens who even slightly leaned toward the opposing side. After two or three purges like this, many of the prominent families that made rome into a world power were completely in shambles and the bitter rivalries between them made future wars inevitable.
