The statement that best describes one of Aristotle's criticisms of Plato's Forms is Plato's Forms are material obiects.
<h3>How can the
Aristotle's criticisms of Plato's Forms be described?</h3>
The Aristotle's criticisms of Plato's Forms was base on the rejection of the theory behind the form but not the notion, since Aristotle believe that for every form that is been seen in existence, then there is something that form it.
In conclusion, Aristotle believe that no form is independent, hence he criticize the Plato's Forms by saying it is material obiects which makes the first option to be correct.
Therefore, the option A is correct.
Learn more about Aristotle at:
brainly.com/question/24994054
#SPJ1
Answer:
banks must have an information security policy
I believe the answer is: <span>dispositional attributions
</span><span>dispositional attributions refers to the belief that view a person's behavior is the result of internal characteristics that resided within those individuals.
</span>One weakness of this belief is that it failed to consider the role of environmental factors in determining the individuals' behavior
Answer:
The correct answer is a. Humphreys used license plate numbers to target their homes and interview the men without disclosing the real subject of his study.
Explanation:
Laud Humphreys (1930-1988) was a sociologist who for his PhD dissertation wrote a study called <em>Tearoom Trade</em> (1968), where he studied the behavior of males who engaged in homosexual sex in public toilets. Humphreys made a series of discoveries, like finding out that most of the men who engaged in these practices were not openly or overtly homosexual, and even a majority of them (54%) were married. However, his research was widely criticized because of how he performed it. Humphreys acted out as a sort of look-out for the men in the toilets, but without disclosing his identity as a researcher. Moreover, <u>Humphreys followed the unwitting subjects of his study to their homes by </u><u>tracking their license plate numbers and interviewed them</u><u>, posing as a government health officer and hiding his true identity as a sociologist conducting research</u>. Lying to subjects and hiding from them that they're part of a study is frowned upon by the scientific community, so the research was widely controversial, and it's still brought up as an example of the ethics of social research.
