Answer:
Archaeology is the study of the ancient and recent human past through material remains. Archaeologists might study the million-year-old fossils of our earliest human ancestors in Africa. ... Archaeology analyzes the physical remains of the past in pursuit of a broad and comprehensive understanding of human culture.
Archaeologists study past human activity by excavating, dating and interpreting objects and sites of historical interest. They implement excavation projects, informally known as digs, preserve archaelogical remains and collect data that informs their understanding of the past.
Anthropologists study human beings. They look at our origin, development, and behavior.
Explanation:
The correct answer is: a) the right to keep and bear arms.
That is apart of the Second Amendment.
They can mail in an Absentee Ballot
Answer:
The American healthcare system favors economic freedom and growth. The Canadian system prioritizes economic equity and economic security for all citizens.
Explanation:
The healthcare system in the United States reflects economic freedom because people are free to buy the kind of insurance and medical services that they want -- it is not a government-controlled system with universal access like the system they have in Canada. Doctors are also free in the American system to charge more and earn better incomes and to establish profitable private practices if they so desire. There is more economic growth in the United States system so there are more incentives for pharmaceutical companies and medical device companies to invest in research and to innovate on medical treatments.
In Canada, the emphasis is on equity in treatment under the logic that everyone should have access to healthcare whether they are rich or poor. This however creates backlogs and long waits for non-essential surgeries for example. The population however has more economic security because they know in Canada that major illnesses will be covered under the government system. People can go bankrupt from major illnesses and the associated costs in the United States.
Answer:
Yes, I do agree with him.
Explanation:
I do agree with him, as sometimes investigative journalists today are sometimes overexaggerating while researching certain topics, and sometimes can be very biased. Therefore, it is of crucial interest that sometimes they should know when to stop, and to be realistic what is investigative journalism and what is going over the border.