Answer:
Ghrelin (I hope this helps!!)
Explanation:
Answer:
Judicial activism
Explanation:
Judicial Activism is a situation whereby Judges may interpret the Constitution to their taste, adapting it to modern situations: award rights, make other branches take action, Prescribing rather than proscribe.it is based on the philosophy of judicial decision-making as judges allow, mainly, their personal views about public policy to guide and help in their decisions making or taking. In it, the flexibility of the Constitution is inadequate.
In this philosophy, Court can go beyond the words of the Constitution e.g judge can use his own personal intuition or views or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.
Answer:
?
Explanation:
You can ask google
Why are you even asking an arabic question to english peopke?
Countries were more cautious about coming into contact
Although these two historical figures were of course very different in many ways, they were both strong nationalists who hated when their home was invaded.
