Answer:
It was winner-takes-all approach do not count the votes of the losing candidates in each state, It allows the election of a candidate who does not win the majority votes, and it was undemocratic.
The Framers did not so much divide powers among the branches as they required the different branches to share power, resulting in a complex system of checks and balances that prevents any one branch from gaining power over the others.
With a 2/3 vote. If both the Texas Senate and the Texas House get two thirds of votes to override, they can override a veto and nobody can do anything about it. It's similar even in the congress of the federation, not just a Texas thing. This is called a large majority and it's that many people because it's usually about serious things that can't just be decided easily.
A. 41 percent
Hope this helps:)
Answer:
A
Explanation:
manage the revolutionary war.
