In 1493, after reports of Columbus’s discoveries had reached them, the Spanish rulers Ferdinand and Isabella enlisted papal support for their claims to the New World in order to inhibit the Portuguese and other possible rival claimants. To accommodate them, the Spanish-born pope Alexander VI issued bulls setting up a line of demarcation from pole to pole 100 leagues (about 320 miles) west of the Cape Verde Islands. Spain was given exclusive rights to all newly discovered and undiscovered lands in the region west of the line. Portuguese expeditions were to keep to the east of the line. Neither power was to occupy any territory already in the hands of a Christian ruler.
No other European powers facing the Atlantic Ocean ever accepted this papal disposition or the subsequent agreement deriving from it. King John II of Portugal was dissatisfied because Portugal’s rights in the New World were insufficiently affirmed, and the Portuguese would not even have sufficient room at sea for their African voyages. Meeting at Tordesillas, in northwestern Spain, Spanish and Portuguese ambassadors reaffirmed the papal division, but the line itself was moved to 370 leagues (1,185 miles) west of the Cape Verde Islands, or about 46°30′ W of Greenwich. Pope Julius II finally sanctioned the change in 1506. The new boundary enabled Portugal to claim the coast of Brazil after its discovery by Pedro Álvares Cabral in 1500. Brazilian exploration and settlement far to the west of the line of demarcation in subsequent centuries laid a firm basis for Brazil’s claims to vast areas of the interior of South America.
Answer:
Capitalism.
Explanation: Last time someone tried anything else, Russia ended up with Lenin, and China got Mao Zhedong. I'll take my flipping chances with this mess of a country any day.
Answer:
social control theory
Explanation:
Social control theory states that people's commitments, relationships, norms, values and beliefs encourages people not to violet the law. Thus, if the moral codes of individuals are internalized and they are tied into and have the stake in the wider community of them, they will try to limit their propensity to commit any deviant acts.
In the context, according to the findings of the researcher, the students who stayed in a small hall and take active part in social activities are less likely indulge in the activity that violates the law or is illegal. This is in accordance with the social control theory.
Answer:
------->
Explanation:
While participating in protests "supports" a cause, it can have certain negative effects on you and your future, especially at a young age.
1. Depending on the kind of protest, you can be recorded or "arrested", This, of course, goes onto a record of sorts, and employers can see this. It can give them a negative view and decrease the chance of you getting a job.
2. Your social credibility is known and will also be impacted negatively, you will be seen as rebellious and show that you are someone who will drop something (such as work/homework) to march around yelling or holding up a sign, which as you could tell, doesn't look good and will indefinitely will be seen as irresponsible.
