Answer:
Hi
It meant a political situation among the states in which none of them achieved a power superior to the others. It is an idea of the late Middle Ages, applied to major or minor geographic regions that comprise the plurality of sovereign territories. Throughout Europe there is a legitimate feeling, always subject to interpretation, whereby any action required the confirmation of the rest of the States, the most significant case being the invasion of a territory. In this way the doctrine of just war was reached, to the problem of to what extent and to what extent the actual or imminent engraving of a State could mean a warlike justification. Transactions between contestants, neutral or rival, never ended, hence the relevance of diplomacy, as the concepts of balance, neutrality, freedom of Europe or sovereignty are interpreted continuously, while being used in conversations. Some thought of equilibrium as a natural system, because it was a consequence of international relations, and when a great power had too much force it threatened the others, and therefore, had to counteract the disproportion. Others considered it a desired goal for which he had fought.
In the rest of the world this balance of powers is characterized by the profusion of dictatorial or authoritarian regimes that have dominated the political scene and that have influenced the future of their peoples. A second point is the emergence of serious and bloody war conflicts, by territorial issues, which is not explained very well both in its unleashing and in its results, as consequences of the mere quantification of the powers faced. In all these, both in its gestation and its consequences, the role it plays in the character, personal ambitions and strategic conceptions of the leaders or rulers who govern the destinies of the countries involved appears with particular relevance.
Explanation:
50,000×5=250,000
250,000÷4=625,000
250,000-625.000=375.00
Sum=375.00
Answer:
<h2>The correct answer in this case is option C. or MU(c)/P(c)>MU(d)/P(d).</h2>
Explanation:
Under consumer equilibrium theory for two commodity model,a rational consumer maximizes his or her utility when the marginal utility(MU) obtained from consuming one good is equal to the same of the other.This is the fundamental essence of the Law of Equimarginal Utility in Economics.Now,in this case,the consumer will purchase more of good C than good D if the Marginal utility obtained from one unit of good C or MU(c) for the money spend on consumption of good C or price of C,P(c) is greater than the marginal utility obtained from consuming 1 more unit of good D or MU(d) for money spend on purchase of good D or price of that particular unit of D or P(d).Therefore,since the marginal satisfaction compared to the amount of money spend for the consumer is higher for good C compared to the other or good D,it will increase the total utility level of the consumer from that particular consumption bundle or pattern.Hence,he or she will spend more on the consumption of good C than good D.
The covenant whereby one warrants that he is the possessor and owner of property being conveyed is the covenant of seizen.
A covenant is a two-party promise, agreement, or contract. The two parties agree that certain activities will or will not be carried out as part of the covenant.
Covenants in finance typically refer to terms in a financial contract, such as a loan document or bond issue, that specify the maximum amount that the borrower can lend. In religion, covenants frequently convey the binding relationship between a deity and humanity.
Covenants are frequently expressed in terms of financial ratios that must be met, such as a maximum debt-to-asset ratio or other such ratios. Covenants can cover anything from minimum dividend payments to working capital levels that must be maintained to key employees remaining with the company.
Learn more about covenants here:
brainly.com/question/28237935
#SPJ4
When Ashton, the appraiser applies more weight to two comparables over several others he used, he is utilizing the: Correlation method.
<h3>What is the Correlation Method?</h3>
The correlation method is the method utilized in the sales comparison approach where more importance is given to two properties being compared against some others.
The sales comparison approach itself is used in analyzing the worth of a property by comparing it to others that have been sold in recent times.
Learn more about the sales comparison approach here:
brainly.com/question/14497595
