All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following is a reason the government can't completely control the business cycle?

Business

2 answers:

barxatty [35]3 years ago

8 0

Answer: B

The government cannot control interest rates and that is the reason is why the government cannot completely control the business cycle. This is so because interest rate controls the rate of consumer spending, borrowing and spending. Say interest is low, people will borrow more and spend more and this will have an impact in the rate of employment. Hence, in short if the government cannot control interest rate, everything depending on it, the economic cycle cannot be determined.

nikitadnepr [17]3 years ago

4 0

B the government cant control interest rates

You might be interested in

Jamie’s Bakery, a small chain of eight bakeries in Altamonte Springs, Florida has recorded sales growth of 30 percent or more pe

pantera1 [17]

<h3>Answer:</h3>

Gazelle

<h3>Explanation:</h3>

Jamie's Bakery has recorded a growth of 30% and above from 2010 to 2017 with revenues of $229,000.
This makes Jamie's bakery a gazelle company or business due to the growth of 30% in sales per year for a period of more than four years since it was started in 2010.
Gazelle ventures or business are fast growing and expands at a high rate and thus important to an economy.

6 0

3 years ago

Arianna just made another fantastic investment: She purchased 400 shares in Great Gains Corporation for $20.0920.09 per share.

Gwar [14]

Answer:

1. Likely the price of the stock either goes up or falls

2. There is no need for a stop loss order in this scenario.

3. 5412541.2

Explanation:

1. Stock market prices are often unstable, prices can be up today, the next day they are low.

2. Arianna has already made over 100% profit from the stock since she purchased at a good low price, yesterday's stock close price was still profit for her.

3. A 10% Stop loss price would have been the idea order price rather than the $53.7353.73.

4. Remember Stop loss order are meant to reduce or minimize the loss of investor or trader, a calculated level of should be carefully decided.

8 0

3 years ago

A store puts everything on sale for 20% off. If the sales tax is 8%, what percent of the original marked price is the final cost

iogann1982 [59]

Answer:

86.4%

Explanation:

the original marked price is m

then with a sales discount of 20%

the (pre-sales tax) sale price is 100%−20%=80% of

The post-sales tax price is the pre-sales tax price plus 8%,

that is the post-sales tax price is 108%=1.08 of the pre-sales tax price.

Therefore the final cost (i.e. the post-tax price) is

4 0

2 years ago

Which of the following actions would be most likely to reduce potential conflicts between stockholders and bondholders?

bagirrra123 [75]

Answer:

C. Including restrictive covenants in the company's bond indenture (which is the contract between the company and its bondholders).

Explanation:

One of the major actions that would most likely reduce potential conflicts between stockholders and bondholder is the Inclusion of restrictive covenants in the company's bond indenture (which is the contract between the company and its bondholders).

Restrictive covenants are Bond covenants that are designed to protect the interests of both parties by forbiding the issuer from undertaking certain activities that are detrimental to the holders of the bond.

Restrictive covenants manages the agency problem between stockholders and bondholder.

5 0

3 years ago

Twenty years ago, you began investing $250 a month. because your investments earned an average of 8 percent a year, your investm

DaniilM [7]

You invest $250/mo. over 12 months that equals $3,000 invested per year.
$250*12=$3,000/per year invested
$3,000 per year for 20 years equals $60,000 invested.
$3,000*20=$60,000 invested
8% of $60,000 is $4,800/per year.
0.08*$60,000=$4,800
$4,800 per year for 20 years equals $96,000 dollars earned on investments over 20 years.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers