the answer is TRUE...................
Answer: Small states are easier to manage politically, while large states are more likely to be corrupt.
Explanation:
During the Constitutional Convention of 1787, large states claimed to deserve more of a voice due to their larger populations, so they demanded congressional representation to be based on population.
Smaller states, fearing being ignored if that happened, wanted equal representation.
Roger Sherman, based on the idea of small states being easier to be handle politically, and large states being more prone to corruption, proposed the Connecticut Compromise with Oliver Ellsworth, which granted equal representation in the Senate and representation by population in the House, in a bicameral system that provided a balance of power.
The western because he took over more land and ruled more
because it has been reviewed by<u> "a neutral and detached magistrate".</u>
The term neutral and detached magistrate implies that the issuing officer isn't unalterably lined up with the police or prosecutor's situation for the situation.
The Supreme Court has communicated a solid inclination for the utilization of a warrant in police work. Since the testimony has been checked on by a neutral and detached magistrate implies that the issuing officer isn't unalterably lined up with the police or prosecutor's situation for the situation., the issuance of a warrant guarantees an all the more efficient method and is a superior assurance that reasonable justification is, actually, present. In all actuality, be that as it may, by far most of captures and hunts are made without a warrant, under the various exemptions to the warrant prerequisite.
Humans impact the physical environment in many ways: overpopulation, pollution, burning fossil fuels, and deforestation. Changes like these have triggered climate change, soil erosion, poor air quality, and undrinkable water.
