Do you think Buck would be able to rejoin man at some point in his future?
Answer:
<em>Call of the Wild</em> is not only a story about a dog - it is a story about all the beauties and hardships of life, and about reaching independence. Buck was both loved and hurt by men, which only made him stronger. At the end of the novel, Buck has certain learned experience when it comes to living in the wild on his own, and it is unlikely, although possible, that he will ever again rejoin men.
Throughout the novel, Buck had both positive and negative experiences with humans. He was stolen from his home in Santa Clara Valley and sold as a sled dog. This event had a rather negative effect on Buck, since he was quite happy back at judge's ranch. The circumstances, however, made him adapt to a wild environment in order to survive. Buck once again felt loved when he met John Thornton who became his owner, but upon his death, Buck went back into the wild.
If we consider the book ending, it is unlikely that Buck will go back to civilization. At the end of the story, Buck has certain experience in living on his own which he can rely on in the wild. He has become a leader in the wild and is able to dominate other dogs. He does not need people anymore in order to survive, and it is improbable that he will rejoin them.
Answer:
Not very clear. Is this an extract from the book? Please give the reference
B. Asserted Defintion: Assert: Forcefully state a opinion.
This would be the most likely answer, considering that she wants to talk about what she thinks should be done with the crime factor of the city.
Answer:
Explanation:
His “white eyes writhing in his face”, “his hanging face”, the blood jolts “gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs” — all are expressive of the tragic situation the soldiers have to face in war. So, imagery is the device the poet has employed in the poem 'Dulce et Decorum Est' to convey his anti-war message.
Answer:
The answer is option C.
Taney's claim in the passage that African American people were not part of the group considered citizens by the Constitution
Explanation: In the passage Justice Taney claimed that the meaning of citizen according to the constitution does not consider the African American people as a part of citizens. Because even after emancipation there are race inferior activities. The African American people are not enjoying the rights according to the constitution. Still they are the subject to the authority.
